Results: 5465

• R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal (Public Law Project intervening) (R (C) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Public Law Project intervening), R (U) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Public Law Project intervening))

  01 Dec 2009 [2009] EWHC 3052 (Admin); [2011] QB 120; [2010] 2 WLR 1012; [2010] PTSR 824; [2010] 1 All ER 908; [2010] STC 493, DC

  23 Jul 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 859; [2011] QB 120; [2011] 2 WLR 36; [2011] PTSR 42; [2010] 4 All ER 714; [2010] STC 2556; [2010] WLR (D) 198, CA (Laws LJ, Owen J)

  22 Jun 2011 [2011] UKSC 28; [2012] 1 AC 663; [2011] 3 WLR 107; [2011] PTSR 1053; [2011] 4 All ER 127; [2011] STC 1659; [2012] 1 FLR 997; [2011] WLR (D) 203; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 6 positive; 5 neutral; most recently considered: 2021. Subsequent citations: 158.
  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Special Immigration Appeals Commission

  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Upper Tribunal
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Special Immigration Appeals Commission — Commission “superior court of record” — Commission revoking and refusing bail on basis of closed evidence without disclosing gist to claimants — Decisions unappealable — Whether commission alter ego of High Court — Whether decisions susceptible to judicial review — Whether violating claimants' Convention rights — Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, s 1(3) (as inserted by Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, s 35)

  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Upper Tribunal — Tribunal “superior court of record” — Tribunal refusing permission to appeal to itself — Decision unappealable — Whether tribunal alter ego of High Court — Whether decision susceptible to judicial review — Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 3(5)

  16 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  2 Statutes considered
• R (Morge) v Hampshire County Council

  17 Nov 2009 [2009] EWHC 2940 (Admin); [2010] Env LR 432, QBD (Judge Bidder QC)

  10 Jun 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 608; [2010] PTSR 1882; [2010] LGR 961; [2010] WLR (D) 145, CA

  19 Jan 2011 [2011] UKSC 2; [2011] 1 WLR 268; [2011] PTSR 337; [2011] 1 All ER 744; [2011] LGR 271; [2011] WLR (D) 5; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 124.
  EUROPEAN UNION — Environment — Natural habitats

  PLANNING — Development — Natural habitats
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  EUROPEAN UNION — Environment — Natural habitats — Local planning authority granting permission for development affecting species or habitat of European protected species — Whether effects of development constituting “deliberate disturbance” of protected species — Whether planning decision made in breach of requirements of Council Directive — Council Directive 92/43/EEC, art 12(1)(b)

  PLANNING — Development — Natural habitats — European protected species — Local planning authority granting planning permission for development affecting species or habitat of bats — Whether effects of development constituting “deliberate disturbance” of protected species — Whether necessary to consider indirect, as well as direct, impact upon “deterioration or destruction of breeding sites or resting places” — Whether planning decision made in breach of requirements of Habitats Directive — Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) Regulations 1994 (as amended by Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) (Amendment) Regulations 2007, reg 5 and Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) (Amendment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2009, reg 7), regs 3(4), 39 — Council Directive 92/43/EEC, art 12(1)(b)(d)

  5 Case(s) considered

  2 Words & Phrases considered

  1 EU Enactment considered

  1 Statutory Instrument considered

• R v Rollins (R v McInerney (Michael))

  09 Oct 2009 [2009] EWCA Crim 1941; [2010] Bus LR 734; [2010] 1 All ER 1183; [2010] 1 Cr App R 14; [2009] WLR (D) 294, CA

  28 Jul 2010 [2010] UKSC 39; [2010] 1 WLR 1922; [2010] Bus LR 1529; [2010] 4 All ER 880; [2011] 1 Cr App R 4; [2010] WLR (D) 210; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent citations: 7.
  FINANCIAL SERVICES — Market abuse — Penalties and injunction
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  FINANCIAL SERVICES — Market abuse — Penalties and injunction — Institution of proceedings — Financial Services Authority — Whether FSA empowered to institute proceedings for criminal offences under statutes other than Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 — Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, ss 1(1), 401, 402 (as amended by Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, Sch 7(7), para 33(4)) — Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, ss 327(1), 328(1) (as amended by Enterprise Act 2002, Sch 2, para 40(17))

  2 Case(s) considered

  4 Statutes considered

• Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

  31 Jul 2009 [2009] EWHC 2011 (QB); [2009] IRLR 822, QBD (Nicol J)

  26 May 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 571; [2011] QB 339; [2010] 3 WLR 1285; [2010] ICR 1181; [2010] WLR (D) 135, CA

  14 Dec 2011 [2011] UKSC 58; [2012] 2 AC 22; [2012] 2 WLR 55; [2012] ICR 201; [2012] 2 All ER 278; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent citations: 32.
  EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Breach of contract
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Breach of contract — Summary dismissal on ground of gross misconduct — Employer failing to comply with contractual disciplinary procedure — Employee unable to obtain equivalent post — Whether damages recoverable for breach of contract

  7 Case(s) considered

• Brough v Law (SL v Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission)

  11 Dec 2009 [2009] UKUT 270 (AAC); [2011] 1 FLR 322, UT (Judge Levenson)

  20 Oct 2011 [2011] EWCA Civ 1183; [2012] 1 WLR 1021; [2012] PTSR 897; [2012] 1 FLR 375; [2011] WLR (D) 300; The Times, 7 November 2011, CA (Pill LJ, Rimer LJ, Lewison LJ)

  SOCIAL SECURITY — Child support maintenance — Assessment

  CHILDREN — Child maintenance orders — Effect of reconciliation
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  SOCIAL SECURITY — Child support maintenance — Assessment — Assessment of absent parent — Maintenance assessment carried out on absent parent of qualifying child before parents briefly reconciled — During reconciliation father no longer absent parent — Whether child no longer “qualifying child” — Whether assessment ceasing to have effect as result of reconciliation — Child Support Act 1991, s 3, Sch 1, para 16(1)(b)

  CHILDREN — Child maintenance orders — Effect of reconciliation — Whether decision by statutory decision-maker required for assessment to cease to have effect

  1 Case considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  1 Statute considered
• DCC Holdings (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs

  08 May 2007 [2007] 5 WLUK 152, Special Comrs (Charles Hellier)

  17 Oct 2008 [2008] EWHC 2429 (Ch); [2009] STC 77, Ch D (Norris J)

  10 Nov 2009 [2009] EWCA Civ 1165; [2010] STC 80, CA (Rix, Moses and Rimer LJJ)

  15 Dec 2010 [2010] UKSC 58; [2011] 1 WLR 44; [2011] 1 All ER 537; [2011] STC 326; [2010] WLR (D) 333; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 2 positive. Subsequent citations: 18.
  REVENUE — Corporation tax — Deemed loan transactions

  STATUTE — Construction — Deeming provision
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  REVENUE — Corporation tax — Deemed loan transactions — Correct application of deeming provisions — “Repo” transactions providing for securities to be bought and sold back for specified price after pre-determined period — Tax statute deeming repo transactions to be short-term secured loans — Statute requiring interest payments to be brought into account as credits and debits from deemed loan relationship — Taxpayer company buying gilts under repo transaction — Taxpayer receiving six-monthly interest coupon during 18-day period of ownership — Taxpayer claiming deeming provision allowing credit for apportioned interest only but debit for full interest payment — Whether deeming provision to be restricted to extent necessary to reflect statutory purpose — Whether statutory purpose requiring symmetrical debits and credits in respect of deemed loan relationship — Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (as amended by Finance Act 1994, s 122, Finance Act 1995, s 80(1), Finance Act 1996, s 205, Sch 41, Pt V(21) and Finance Act 1997, s 113, Sch 18, Pt VI(10)), ss 730A(2), 737A — Finance Act 1996 (as amended by Finance Act 1997, s 113, Sch 18, Pt VI(10)), ss 84(1), 97(2)(4)

  STATUTE — Construction — Deeming provision — Correct application — Artificial assumption required by deeming provision not to be taken further than warranted by statutory purpose

  4 Case(s) considered

  2 Statutes considered
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) (Secretary of State for the Home Department v AM, Secretary of State for the Home Department v AN, Secretary of State for the Home Department v AE)

  10 Mar 2008 (No 2) [2008] EWHC 453 (Admin); [2008] ACD 53, QBD (Stanley Burnton J)

  09 Apr 2008 (No 3) [2008] EWHC 689 (Admin); [2008] 4 All ER 340; The Times, 25 April 2008, QBD (Stanley Burnton J)

  17 Oct 2008 [2008] EWCA Civ 1148; [2010] 2 AC 269; [2009] 2 WLR 423; [2009] 2 All ER 602; The Times, 29 October 2008, CA

  10 Jun 2009 [2009] UKHL 28; [2010] 2 AC 269; [2009] 3 WLR 74; [2009] 3 All ER 643; 26 BHRC 738; The Times, 11 June 2009; [2009] WLR (D) 180, HL(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 10 positive; 4 neutral; 5 negative; most recently considered: 2021. Subsequent citations: 147.
  HUMAN RIGHTS — Right to fair trial — Suspected international terrorist
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HUMAN RIGHTS — Right to fair trial — Suspected international terrorist — Home Secretary issuing non-derogating control orders — Court hearing to consider whether Home Secretary's decision flawed — Some or all of material not disclosed to controlee — Special advocates appointed to represent controlee with sight of closed material not disclosed to controlee — Whether hearing necessarily unfair absent disclosure to controlee of irreducible minimum of information — Whether procedure in breach of controlee's Convention right to fair trial — Human Rights Act 1998, Sch 1, Pt I, art 6 — Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005, s 3(10), Sch, para 4 — CPR, Pt 76

  8 Case(s) considered

  2 Statutes considered

  1 Statutory Instrument considered
• Parabola Investments Ltd v Browallia Cal Ltd (formerly Union Cal Ltd)

  06 May 2009 [2009] EWHC 901 (Comm); [2009] 2 All ER (Comm) 589, QBD (Flaux J)

  05 May 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 486; [2011] QB 477; [2010] 3 WLR 1266; [2010] Bus LR 1446; [2011] 1 All ER (Comm) 210; [2010] WLR (D) 114, CA (Mummery, Toulson, Rimer LJJ)

  Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 2 neutral. Subsequent citations: 34.
  DAMAGES — Deceit — Measure of damages
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DAMAGES — Deceit — Measure of damages — Claimant trading stocks and shares through defendant stockbrokers — Trading resulting in disastrous losses concealed by defendant falsely representing to claimant that trading profitable — Claimant's investment fund much depleted before fraud discovered — Claimant thereafter trading profitably with reduced fund — Claimant bringing action in deceit — Whether entitled to damages for lost opportunity to trade with unreduced fund during period from discovery of fraud up to date of trial — Whether discovery of fraud marking cut-off point for damages claim

  5 Case(s) considered
• Bloomsbury International Ltd v Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

  24 Jul 2009 [2009] EWHC 1721 (QB); [2010] 1 CMLR 344, QBD (Hamblen J)

  18 Mar 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 263; [2010] 1 WLR 2117; [2010] 3 All ER 126; [2010] WLR (D) 80, CA (Mummery, Richards, Rimer LJJ)

  15 Jun 2011 (Sea Fish Industry Authority intervening) [2011] UKSC 25; [2011] 1 WLR 1546; [2011] 4 All ER 721; [2011] 3 CMLR 32; [2011] WLR (D) 195; Case details, SC(E) (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers PSC, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance JJSC, Lord Collins of Mapesbury)

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 50.
  FISHERY — Sea fishing — Levy
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  FISHERY — Sea fishing — Levy — Statute empowering levy on sea fish and sea fish products “landed in the United Kingdom” — Subordinate legislation imposing levy on sea fish and sea fish products imported from outside United Kingdom — Whether ultra vires — Whether levy on imported sea fish products charge having equivalent effect to customs duty — Fisheries Act 1981 (as amended by Sea Fish Industry Authority (Levy Powers) Order, art 2), ss 2(1), 4(3), 14(2) — Sea Fish Industry Authority (Levy) Regulations 1995 Confirmatory Order 1996, Sch, para 4 — FEU Treaty, arts 28FEU, 30FEU, 110FEU

  7 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  1 EU Enactment considered

  1 Statute considered

  1 Statutory Instrument considered
• Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department

  07 Apr 2009 (Appeal No SC/66/2008), SIAC

  29 Mar 2012 [2012] EWCA Civ 358, CA

  09 Oct 2013 (Open Society Justice Initiative intervening) [2013] UKSC 62; [2014] AC 253; [2013] 3 WLR 1006; [2014] 1 All ER 356; [2013] WLR (D) 371; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral; 2 negative. Subsequent citations: 13.
  NATIONALITY — British citizenship — Deprivation of citizenship
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  NATIONALITY — British citizenship — Deprivation of citizenship — Iraqi citizen acquiring British nationality and thereby losing Iraqi citizenship — Home Secretary subsequently depriving claimant of British citizenship as being conducive to public good — Claimant not applying for restoration of Iraqi citizenship — Whether effect of order to render claimant stateless — Whether order void — British Nationality Act 1981, s 40(4) (as substituted by Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, s 4(1))

  1 Case considered

  1 Statute considered