Results: 106

  • Peplow v Richardson

    05 Feb 1868 LR 4 CP 168, CP

    SUNDAYPublic-houseRefreshment for Travellers on Sunday
  • Bennett v Brumfitt (Ashcroft's case)

    09 Nov 1868 LR 4 CP 399, CP

  • The Conservators Of The River Thames v The Victoria Station and Pimlico Railway Co

    14 Nov 1868 LR 4 CP 59, CP

    RAILWAYRailway company: compensation for lands taken under the lands clauses consolidation act, 1845 (8 & 9 vict. c. 18), s. 68Conservators of the Thames: Ownership of the Soil of the Bed and Foreshore.
    KEATING, J. I am of opinion that the rule to enter a verdict for the defendants in this case should be discharged. The plaintiffs bring their action to recover the amount awarded to them by arbitrators appointed under the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845, to assess the compensation payable to them by the defendants for taking and injuriously affecting lands belonging to them. The plaintiffs are the conservators of the river Thames. By the act of 1857, 20 & 21 Vict. c. cxlvii, the soil of the bed and foreshore of the river is vested in the conservators. That is
  • Barnes v Peters (Perowne v Peters, Bakewell v Peters)

    05 Jun 1869 LR 4 CP 539, CP

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PARLIAMENTBorough VoteLodger
  • Callaghan v Dolwin

    06 May 1869 LR 4 CP 288, CP

    FRIENDLY SOCIETYConstruction of RulesFinality of Decision of Arbitrators or Justices
  • Ings v The London and South Western Railway Co

    25 Nov 1868 LR 4 CP 17, CP

    COSTSCounty Courts Act, 1867 (30 & 31 Vict. c. 142), s. 5Verdict in Tort for less than 10l.
    BOVILL, C.J. The Statute of Gloucester has no application to cases which fall within s. 5 of the 30 & 31 Vict. c. 142, viz. where the action is commenced after the passing of that act. The act came into operation on the 1st of January, 1868. From that day it operated upon all actions commenced after the 20th of August, 1867, the day on which it passed. There is no ex post facto legislation in that. Ample notice is given to all who are to be affected by it. This action was commenced on the 5th of October, 1867.
  • Robinson v Ainge

    16 Jan 1869 LR 4 CP 429, CP

    PARLIAMENTCounty VoteFriendly Society
  • Foster v Mackinnon

    05 Jul 1869 LR 4 CP 704, CP

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 3.
    BILL OF EXCHANGEIndorsement obtained by means of a Fraudulent RepresentationMisdirection
  • Cuthbertson v Butterworth

    24 Nov 1868 LR 4 CP 523, CP

    PARLIAMENTBorough VoteReform Act (2 Wm. 4, c. 45), s. 27
  • Sykes v Sykes

    04 Jun 1869 LR 4 CP 645, CP

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    PRACTICECosts, Security forPlaintiff suing as Executor

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies