Results: 85

  • Lawlor v Union of Post Office Workers

    29 Oct 1964 [1965] Ch 712; [1965] 2 WLR 579; [1965] 1 All ER 353, Ch D

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 11.
    NATURAL JUSTICEOpportunity to meet chargeExpulsion from trade union
    NATURAL JUSTICETrade union rulesWhether doctrine applicable
    TRADE UNIONExpulsionRight of action
    TRIBUNALDomesticControl by courts
  • Young v Markworth Properties Ltd

    02 Feb 1965 [1965] Ch 475; [1965] 2 WLR 679; [1965] 1 All ER 834, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PRACTICEChancery DivisionSummary judgment
  • In re Peretz Co Ltd

    12 Oct 1964 [1965] Ch 200; [1964] 3 WLR 1159; [1964] 3 All ER 633, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    LEGAL AIDCertificateAmbit
  • In re White Rose Cottage

    20 Dec 1963 [1964] Ch 483; [1964] 2 WLR 396; [1964] 1 All ER 169, Ch D

    12 Nov 1964 [1965] Ch 940; [1965] 2 WLR 337; [1965] 1 All ER 11, CA

    01 Dec 1964 (pet dis) [1965] 2 WLR 349, HL(E)

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 13.
    LAND REGISTRATIONCharges registerPriority of entries
    LAW REFORMWhether necessaryLand registration
    MORTGAGEBank's chargeRegistered land
  • Inland Revenue Comrs v Parker (Inland Revenue Comrs v Tomlinson)

    28 Jul 1964 [1965] Ch 866; [1964] 3 WLR 1121; [1964] 3 All ER 510, Ch D

    08 Feb 1965 [1965] Ch 1032; [1965] 2 WLR 1141; [1967] 2 WLR 1141; [1965] 1 All ER 796, CA

    27 Jan 1966 [1966] AC 141; [1966] 2 WLR 486; [1966] 1 All ER 399; 43 TC 396, HL(E)

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 5 neutral. Subsequent citations: 21.
    REVENUETax advantageTransaction in securities
  • In re Valentine’s Settlement

    07 Jul 1964 [1965] Ch 226; [1964] 3 WLR 768; [1964] 3 All ER 174, Ch D (Pennycuick J)

    03 Mar 1965 [1965] Ch 831; [1965] 2 WLR 1015; [1965] 2 All ER 226, CA (Lord Denning MR, Danckwerts and Salmon LJJ)

    Subsequent considerations : 6 positive; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 14.
    CONFLICT OF LAWSAdoptionSuccession
    SETTLEMENTConstruction“Children”
  • British Broadcasting Corpn v Johns

    05 Mar 1964 [1965] Ch 32; [1964] 2 WLR 1071; [1964] 1 All ER 923; 41 TC 471, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 29.
    CROWNPrerogativeIncome tax
    CROWNPrerogativeMonopoly
    REVENUEIncome taxExpenses of trade or profession (Schedule D)
    REVENUEIncome taxProfits of trade
  • In re Jones’s Will Trusts

    12 May 1965 [1965] Ch 1124; [1965] 3 WLR 506; [1965] 2 All ER 828, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    ADOPTIONWardshipWill
    WILLConstructionChildren
    WILLConstructionExtrinsic evidence
  • In re B (JA) (An Infant)

    09 Mar 1965 [1965] Ch 1112; [1965] 3 WLR 253; [1965] 3 All ER 168, Ch D

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 18.
    CONTEMPT OF COURTPracticeApplication in wardship proceedings
    CONTEMPT OF COURTSentenceCriminal contempt
    CONTEMPT OF COURTWitnesses, influencingPending proceedings
    INFANTWard of courtEvidence
  • British Railways Board v Glass

    09 Dec 1963 [1964] 1 WLR 294; [1964] 1 All ER 418, Ch D

    29 Jul 1964 [1965] Ch 538; [1966] Ch 538; [1964] 3 WLR 913; [1964] 3 All ER 418, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 3 neutral. Subsequent citations: 13.
    EASEMENTPrescriptionRight of way
    RAILWAYLevel crossingAccommodation road

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies