Results: 225

  • In Re Taylor; Smart v Taylor

    25 Apr 1901 [1901] 2 Ch 134, Ch D

    WILLContingent InterestAccumulation.
    COZENS-HARDY J. I think that in this case there must be an accumulation for twenty-one years, or until the event that there can be no child who can take a vested interest happens. I am bound to say that I do not understand the principle upon which Fry J. in Green v. Tribe held there was an intestacy as to the income. I need not say that I should follow with the greatest respect a clear decision of that learned judge on a question of principle; but I do not follow the legal process by which he arrived at the
  • Manchester Brewery Co v Coombs

    27 Mar 1900 [1901] 2 Ch 608, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 3.
    LANDLORD AND TENANTBrewer's LeaseCovenant to buy Beer of Lessors and “their Successors in Business”
  • Foster v New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co Ltd

    27 Nov 1900 [1901] 1 Ch 208, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COMPANYDividendAccretion to Capital
  • In Re Taylor; Guardians Of Edmonton Union v Deely

    29 Jan 1901 [1901] 1 Ch 480, CA

    LUNACYLunaticPauper
  • In Re Selous; Thomson v Selous

    20 Mar 1901 [1901] 1 Ch 921, Ch D

    MERGEREquitable Tenancy in CommonLegal Joint Tenancy.
    FARWELL J. In my opinion the assignment of June 24, 1895, created a joint tenancy in law and equity. It has been contended that it only created a joint tenancy of the legal estate, and that the equitable tenancy in common remained unaffected, the daughters merely holding the legal estate as joint tenants in trust for themselves as tenants in common. But I do not think that is the true view. The rule in Selby v. Alston, namely, that where equitable and legal estates, equal and coextensive, unite in the same person, the former merges, or, in other words, that
  • Bath v Bath

    17 Jan 1901 [1901] 1 Ch 460, Ch D

    PRACTICEFund in CourtPayment out to Person not entitled
  • In Re Greenwood; Sutcliffe v Gledhill

    15 Feb 1901 [1901] 1 Ch 887, Ch D

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 4.
    WILLForfeiture clauseGift of Income to A. for Life or until Alienation
  • In Re Pitt Rivers; Scott v Pitt Rivers

    28 Jan 1901 [1901] 1 Ch 352, Ch D

    WILLCharitable GiftSecret Trust
  • In Re Chisholm’s Settlement

    21 May 1900 [1901] 2 Ch 82, Ch D

    MARRIAGEMarried womanPower of Appointment
  • In Re Harvey; Harvey v Harvey

    06 Jun 1901 [1901] 2 Ch 290, Ch D

    LANDReal estate limited in strict settlementIncome of Personal Estate to be Paid to A. for Life

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies