Results: 221

  • In Re Daniell’s Settled Estates

    10 Aug 1894 [1894] 3 Ch 503, CA

    SETTLED LANDSettled land actsBuilding Lease
  • Page v Midland Railway Co

    09 Nov 1893 [1894] 1 Ch 11, CA

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    COVENANTCovenants for titleIncumbrance
  • Bailey v Barnes

    30 Oct 1893 [1894] 1 Ch 25, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 10.
    VENDOR AND PURCHASERConstructive NoticePurchaser of Legal Estate
  • In Re Gilson; Gilson v Gilson

    02 Mar 1894 [1894] 2 Ch 92, Ch D

    PRACTICEThird Party Notice“Person not a Party to Action”
  • Nutter v Holland

    02 Aug 1894 [1894] 3 Ch 408, CA

    PRACTICEOrder for Payment into CourtMoney not in the hands of Trustees
  • Skinner & Co v Shew & Co

    31 May 1894 [1894] 2 Ch 581, Ch D

    PATENT“Threats”Injunction
  • In Re Taylor, Sons, & Tarbuck

    02 Feb 1894 [1894] 1 Ch 503, Ch D

    SOLICITORCostsTaxation
  • In Re Newen; Newen v Barnes

    01 Mar 1894 [1894] 2 Ch 297, Ch D

    SETTLED LANDSettled estateTenant for Life
  • In Re Tyssen Knight-Bruce v Butterworth

    10 Nov 1893 [1894] 1 Ch 56, Ch D

    POWER OF APPOINTMENTAppointment to Trustee for object of PowerTransfer of Fund to Trustee nominated by Donee of Power.
    Nov. 10. NORTH, J.: — Having regard to what was said in the Court of Appeal in Scotney v. Lomer, I must follow Busk v. Aldam if it applies to the present case. I think it clearly does apply. That being so, my answer to the question will be, that the fund ought not to be transferred to Mrs. Butterworth, but ought to be retained by the Plaintiffs as trustees of the original settlement.
  • Collis v Laugher

    22 Jun 1894 [1894] 3 Ch 659, Ch D

    EASEMENTLight and AirUnfinished House

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies