Results: 106

  • In Re Croughton’s Trusts

    04 May 1878 8 ChD 460, Ch D

    MARRIAGEMarried womanSeparate Use
  • School Board For London v Faulconer

    22 May 1878 8 ChD 571, Ch D

    CHARITYCharity estateScheme
  • In Re Ambrose Lake Tin and Copper Co

    17 Apr 1878 8 ChD 643, CA

    PRACTICERules of court, 1875, order lviii., r. 15Extension of Time to appeal.
    COCKBURN, L.C.J.:— We think that this is a case in which, looking at the special circumstances, we may enlarge the time for appealing. COTTON, L.J.:— I put it expressly on this, that notice of appeal had been given within the time, so that it cannot be said that the other side did not know of the determination to appeal, and I think that a withdrawing for a day of the notice ought not to preclude the party from appealing. THESIGER, L.J.:— In my judgment, the fact adverted to by Lord Justice Cotton makes a very material distinction between this case
  • Banco De Lima v Anglo-Peruvian Bank

    04 Feb 1878 8 ChD 160, Ch D

    BANKINGBankersCredit Agency
  • Backhouse v Charlton

    26 Mar 1878 8 ChD 444, Ch D

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 1.
    BANKINGBankersPartnership Accounts
  • De Bussche v Alt

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 12.
  • Keene v Biscoe

    02 Mar 1878 8 ChD 201, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    MORTGAGEMortgageePunctual Payment
  • Odessa Tramways Co v Mendel

    23 Feb 1878 8 ChD 235, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    SPECIFIC PERFORMANCEDivisible ContractPerformance of Part
  • Associated Home Co v Whichcord

    23 May 1878 8 ChD 457, Ch D

    PRACTICEThird Party NoticeRules of Court, 1875, Order XVI., r. 17.
    MALINS, V.C., after stating the circumstances, continued:— If this Court decides that the company are entitled to recover the £2000, and to reduce the purchase-money to £12,000, the Plaintiffs in the Exchequer Court can get nothing, for they are by agreement to have as commission the excess over £12,000. But I do not see why the Plaintiffs here should be embarrassed with any question between the Defendant Whichcord and other persons. I think it is unreasonable that they should be encumbered with four Defendants. As a matter of principle, and in the exercise of my discretion, and following the authority
  • Ex Parte Pottinger, In Re Stewart

    11 Apr 1878 8 ChD 621, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    DEBTPreferential debtsProof

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies