Results: 119

  • Kevan v Crawford

    22 Jun 1877 6 ChD 29, CA

    FRAUDFraudulent settlement13 Eliz. c. 5
  • Ex Parte Sheen, In Re Wright

    26 Jul 1877 6 ChD 235, CA

    BANKRUPTCYProof by partnerJoint Estate
  • Ex Parte Furber, In Re Pellew

    14 May 1877 6 ChD 181, Ch D

    BANKRUPTCYLiquidation by ArrangementCreditor under Bill of Sale repeatedly renewed
  • Smith v Crabtree

    18 Jun 1877 6 ChD 591, Ch D

    WILLConstruction of willAdvances to Legatee
  • In Re Stringer’s Estate; Shaw v Jones-Ford

    12 Jun 1877 6 ChD 1, CA

    WILLAbsolute Gift followed by Gift over of Property undisposed ofDevisee dying before Testator
  • Morgan v Thomas (No 1)

    08 Jun 1877 6 ChD 176, Ch D

    WILLConstructionSpecific Legacy
  • Taylor v Corpn Of St Helens

    21 Jun 1877 6 ChD 264, CA

    EASEMENTGrant of WatercoursesArtificial Channel
  • In re Gordon (Roberts v Gordon)

    27 Jul 1877 6 ChD 531, Ch D (Jessel MR)

    WILLTrust for Sale of Real EstateLegal Estate
  • In Re Hoskin’s Trusts

    09 Feb 1877 5 ChD 229, Ch D

    25 Jun 1877 6 ChD 281, CA

    APPEALAppeal for costsTrustees
  • Thorn v Worthing Skating Rink Co

    6 ChD 415, HC

    JESSEL, M.R.:— This case comes before me on motion for an interlocutory injunction upon a patent which has been already established, and therefore there is no question of the validity of the patent on this occasion, and the only question I have to decide is, whether there is a case for an injunction. Now, what is the meaning of infringement? I wish to take the law upon that subject from an address to the jury by the late Chief Justice Tindal in the case of Walton. v. Potter (1 Webs, P. R. 586, 587): “Where a party has obtained a

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies