Results: 137

  • In Re Caerphilly Colliery Co

    16 Dec 1876 4 ChD 222, Ch D

    21 Feb 1877 5 ChD 336, CA

    Subsequent citations: 7.
    COMPANYDirectorsQualification given by Promoter
  • Lacey v Hill

    08 Nov 1876 4 ChD 537, CA

    BANKRUPTCYConcealed Overdrawing by PartnerProof on behalf of Joint against Separate Estate.
    JESSEL, M.R.:— This case, apart from the magnitude of the amount claimed and from the painful circumstances connected with the great fraud committed by the deceased baronet Sir Robert Harvey, is one of a very ordinary description, not presenting to my mind any difficulties of law or of fact. I will state shortly the nature of the case. In June 1860 Sir Robert Harvey, being then Mr. Harvey, was carrying on business alone as a banker. It is at least doubtful whether he was solvent at that time, at any rate there is no doubt that the large capital which
  • In Re Dawes’ Trusts

    08 Dec 1876 4 ChD 210, Ch D

    WILLConstructionPeriod of Distribution
  • In Re Beale, Ex Parte Corbridge

    04 Dec 1876 4 ChD 246, Ch D

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive.
    BANKRUPTCYProofLoan of Money to Trader to be employed in his Business
  • In Re Bradford Tramways Co

    17 Mar 1876 2 ChD 373, Ch D (Malins V-C)

    14 Nov 1876 4 ChD 18, CA

    COMPANYDeposit in pursuance of Standing OrdersApplication of Deposit
  • In Re European Central Railway Co, Ex Parte Oriental Financial Corpn

    25 Nov 1876 4 ChD 33, CA

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    COMPANYWinding-upProof
  • Warner v Murdoch

    13 Jan 1877 4 ChD 750, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    JURYTrial by juryTrial before a Judge of Chancery Division
  • Ex Parte Williamson

    17 Nov 1876 4 ChD 581, Ch D

    SOLICITORArticled clerkImplied Cancellation of Articles by Mutual Consent
  • Ex Parte Saffery, In Re Cooke

    21 Dec 1876 4 ChD 555, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    BANKRUPTCYStock Exchange RulesFraudulent Preference.
    Dec. 21. JAMES, L.J., delivered the judgment of the Court (James, L.J., Baggallay, J.A., and Brett, J.A.):— In this case the bankrupt was a member of the Stock Exchange. Finding himself one day unable to meet his engagements, he submitted himself to the domestic jurisdiction which is established by that body in like cases. He attended an official meeting of his creditors. There he was interrogated as to his assets and liabilities, and he stated among other things that he had at his bankers a sum of £5000. He was thereupon requested — or perhaps it might be stated that
  • In Re Dendy

    02 Feb 1877 4 ChD 879, Ch D

    SETTLED LANDSettled estates act, 1856 (19 & 20 vict. c. 120), ss. 1, 17Settled Estates (Amendment) Act, 1874 (37 & 38 Vict. c. 33), s. 2

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies