Results: 104

• In re Speight

  20 Jan 1883 22 Ch D 727; [1875-1890] 22 Ch 727, CA (BACON, V.C. JESSEL, M.R., LINDLEY and BOWEN, L.JJ.)

  26 Nov 1883 9 App Cas 1, HL

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 16.
  TRUSTEE — Trustee and cestui que trust — Liability of Trustee for Trust Moneys lost through Broker.

  TRUSTEE AND CESTUI QUE TRUST — Loss of Trust Fund — Employment of Broker
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  TRUSTEE — Trustee and cestui que trust — Liability of Trustee for Trust Moneys lost through Broker.

  TRUSTEE AND CESTUI QUE TRUST — Loss of Trust Fund — Employment of Broker — Ordinary Course of Business — Negligence.

  1 Case considered

• Wilson v De Coulon

  20 Feb 1883 22 ChD 841 {0} {1}, Ch D (Fry J)

  PRACTICE — Commission to take Evidence abroad — Single Commissioner
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PRACTICE — Commission to take Evidence abroad — Single Commissioner — Administration of Oath — Rules of Supreme Court, April 1880, Schedule, Form G.11
• Eaton v Storer

  15 Nov 1882 22 ChD 91 {0} {1}, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 2.
  PRACTICE — Pleadings — Leave to deliver Reply after Time
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PRACTICE — Pleadings — Leave to deliver Reply after Time — Rules of Court, 1875, Order XXIV. r. 1 ; Order LVII., r. 6.
• Mchenry v Lewis

  13 May 1882 21 ChD 202, Ch D (Chitty J)

  09 Dec 1882 22 ChD 397, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 1.
  PRACTICE — Stay of proceedings — Two Actions in this Country
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PRACTICE — Stay of proceedings — Two Actions in this Country — Action in foreign country — Lis alibi pendens — Actions in rem — Actions in personam.

  1 Case considered

• Ex parte Bath; In re Phillips

  23 Nov 1882 22 ChD 450 {0} {1}, CA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  BANKRUPTCY — Proof in bankruptcy — Interest
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  BANKRUPTCY — Proof in bankruptcy — Interest — Mortgage to Building Society — Principal and Interest payable by Monthly Instalments — Bankruptcy Rules, 1870, r. 77.
• In re Pumfrey, Deceased; The Worcester City and County Banking Company v Blick

  17 Nov 1882 22 ChD 255, Ch D (Kay J)

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 1.
  TRUSTEE — Settlement — Power to purchase Land
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  TRUSTEE — Settlement — Power to purchase Land — Advance by Trustee of Part of Purchase-money — Lien.

• In re J B Palmer’s Application; In re Trade-Marks Registration Act, 1875

  10 Nov 1882 22 ChD 88, CA

  PRACTICE — Staying Proceedings — Staying Trial of Issue pending Appeal on Question of Law
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PRACTICE — Staying Proceedings — Staying Trial of Issue pending Appeal on Question of Law — Rules of Court, 1875, Order LVIII., r. 16.

• Croggan v Allen

  12 May 1882 22 ChD 101, Ch D (Fry J)

  COSTS — Administration
  FRY, J.:— In this action the only question remaining for decision is the question of costs. Another question was raised, which was this, whether the Defendants who had paid into the account of the Plaintiff the income from about a year after the death of her husband were bound to obtain from her a copy of her account and to verify that for her information. That question is I believe the only other question which has arisen in the action. That came before the Chief Clerk, and he determined that such an account must be obtained by the Defendants from
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  COSTS — Administration

• Ex parte Jacobson; In re Pincoffs

  30 Nov 1882 22 ChD 312, CA

  DEBT — Debtor's summons — Security
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DEBT — Debtor's summons — Security — Solvent Debtor — Bonâ fide Dispute as to Debt — Bankruptcy Act, 1869 (32 & 33 Vict.c. 71), s. 7 — Right of Respondent to insist on having his Evidence heard.

• Ex parte Nichols; In re Jones

  01 Feb 1883 22 ChD 782, CA

  Subsequent citations: 3.
  JESSEL, M.R.:— This is a total misapprehension of the nature of the bankruptcy law. Let us consider what the contract with the railway company was. The debtors carried on the business of the Alexandra Palace, and they made an arrangement with the railway company to this effect, that the fees paid by the public for conveyance to the Palace and admission into it should be received in one gross sum by the railway company, and that this sum should be divided in certain specified proportions between the debtors and the company. For this lump sum the railway company were to