Results: 101

  • Morley v Clifford

    04 Apr 1882 20 ChD 753, Ch D

    COMMONAppurtenantCopyhold
  • Ex Parte Reynolds, In Re Reynolds

    16 Mar 1882 20 ChD 294, CA

    Subsequent citations: 8.
    EVIDENCEWitnessPrivilege
  • Ricketts v Lewis

    03 Apr 1882 20 ChD 745, Ch D

    ADMINISTRATORPower to mortgage Leaseholds of IntestateRepairs.
    FRY, J., after referring to the deed of the 30th of June, 1869, and the recital in it above stated, continued:— The question is whether there is a valid charge of the £100 on the entirety of the property. The deed was executed thirty-six years after the death of the intestate. That lapse of time raised the presumption that there were no debts of the intestate remaining unpaid, and, indeed, the mortgage deed itself raises the same presumption. What authority had the administratrix to raise money for the purpose of repairing the property? It may be that she was liable
  • General Share and Trust Co v Wetley Brick and Pottery Co

    25 Jan 1882 20 ChD 260, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 4.
    COMPANYWinding-upDistress by Landlord of Company
  • In Re Henry Smith’s Charity (Hartlepool)

    06 Mar 1882 20 ChD 516, CA

    CHARITYAlteration of SchemeRenewable Leases
  • Attorney-General v Guardians Of Poor Of Union Of Dorking

    24 Mar 1882 (1882) 20 ChD 595, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 5.
    NUISANCEPollution of StreamLocal Board
  • Carter v White

    14 Mar 1882 20 ChD 225, Ch D

    BILL OF EXCHANGEAccepted but not signed by DrawerDeath of Acceptor.
    March 14. KAY, J.:— This case raises a question of some novelty. The chief ground relied upon on behalf of the Plaintiff is that the Defendant, Sir Thomas White, had not at the commencement of this action filled in his name as drawer of the two bills of exchange, and that he cannot do so now after the death of Randle, the acceptor of the bills, and that he is not therefore in a position to hand over those bills of exchange to the Plaintiff as complete securities. It cannot be denied that if an acceptance, blank as to the
  • Wilkinson v Hull, &, Railway and Dock Co

    10 Mar 1882 20 ChD 323, CA

    RAILWAYRailway companyAccommodation Works
  • In Re Baker; Collins v Rhodes

    28 Nov 1881 20 ChD 230, CA

    TRUSTBreach of trustDevastavit
  • In Re Count D’Epineuil (1); Tadman v D’Epineuil

    10 Mar 1882 20 ChD 217, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    ADMINISTRATIONInsolvent EstateJudicature Act, 1875, s. 10

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies