Results: 126

  • Birmingham Canal Co v Cartwright

    02 Apr 1879 11 ChD 421, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 4.
    PERPETUITY RULEPerpetuityCovenant to give unlimited Right of Pre-emption of Land
  • Taite v Gosling

    04 Mar 1879 11 ChD 273, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    INJUNCTIONCovenant“Assign”
  • In Re Bentham Mills Spinning Co

    20 May 1879 11 ChD 900, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COMPANYTransfer of SharesRegistration
  • In Re Roper’s Trusts

    28 Feb 1879 11 ChD 272, Ch D

    INFANTInfantsMaintenance
  • Bolton v Bolton

    10 May 1879 11 Ch D 968; 11 ChD 968, Ch D

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 8.
    RIGHT OF WAYWay of necessityElection
  • Ex Parte Ditton, In Re Woods (No 2)

    20 Feb 1879 11 ChD 56, CA

    APPEALLocus standi of Appellant“Person aggrieved” by Order
  • Robinson v Duleep Singh

    29 Nov 1877 11 ChD 798, Ch D (Fry J)

    27 May 1879 11 ChD 798, CA ( James, Brett and Cotton LJJ)

    LANDCommon appurtenantFold-course
  • London Assurance v Mansel

    01 Mar 1879 11 ChD 363, Ch D

    Subsequent citations: 4.
    ASSURANCEProposal for Policy on LifeConcealment.
    JESSEL, M.R.: — The action in this case is to set aside an agreement for assurance for life on the ground of concealment of a material fact in effecting the assurance. The first question to be decided is, what is the principle on which the Court acts in setting aside contracts of assurance? As regards the general principle I am not prepared to lay down the law as making any difference in substance between one contract of assurance and another. Whether it is life, or fire, or marine assurance, I take it good faith is required in all cases, and,
  • In Re Alison; Johnson v Mounsey

    12 Mar 1879 11 ChD 284, CA

    MORTGAGETrust for SaleSale under Trust
  • Marner v Bright

    15 Nov 1878 11 ChD 394, Ch D

    JESSEL, M.R.: — The order made in Chambers is in the proper form. Such orders have been made several times in my Chambers, When there are several Defendants to an action who wish to try between themselves an issue with which the Plaintiff has nothing to do, but which issue is germane to, and connected with, the matters in dispute, so as to be capable of being tried more cheaply, conveniently, and expeditiously together with the other issues, and the Plaintiff does not object, then the above form of order is made, to carry out the object of the Judicature

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies