Results: 153

  • Castle v Wilkinson

    23 Mar 1870 LR 5 Ch App 534, CA

    VENDOR AND PURCHASERHusband and WifeAbatement in Price.
    LORD HATHERLEY, L.C., after stating the facts of the case, continued:— The only question however is, whether this bill for specific performance can be maintained to the extent of holding that Richardson shall part with all the interest he can part with, namely, his estate for the joint lives of himself and his wife, and his estate by curtesy, with an abatement of the purchase-money. Now, I apprehend that the law is settled as to this upon the authorities referred to by Lord St. Leonards, that if a man professes to be owner of the fee simple, and undertakes to
  • Land Credit Co Of Ireland v Lord Fermoy

    24 Mar 1869 LR 8 Eq 7, Equity

    21 Jul 1870 LR 5 Ch App 763, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative.
    COMPANYDirectorsFraud
  • In re Contract Corpn (No 2) (Ebbw Vale Company's case)

    18 Dec 1869 LR 5 Ch App 112, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    BANKRUPTCYProof in winding-upDebts carrying Interest
  • In re Bank Of Hindustan, China, and Japan (No 2) (Mitchell's case)

    18 Feb 1870 LR 5 Ch App 400, CA

    COMPANYInspectorship deedWinding-up
  • In re International Contract Co (G H Levita’s case)

    04 Mar 1870 LR 5 Ch App 489, CA

    COMPANYAcceptance of SharesNotice of Allotment not sent
  • Chichester v Marquis Of Donegall

    18 Mar 1870 LR 5 Ch App 497, CA

    DISCOVERYProduction of deed by mortgageeInspection of Part of a Deed
  • Allen v Bonnett

    08 Jun 1870 LR 5 Ch App 577, CA

    BANKRUPTCYAct of bankruptcyAssignment
  • Ex parte Greaves, In re Greaves

    22 Jan 1870 LR 5 Ch App 326, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    CREDITORCreditors' deedCancelling Registration
  • In re Family Endowment Society

    12 Jan 1870 LR 5 Ch App 118, CA

    CONTRACTNovation of debtAnnuity granted by Life Assurance Society
  • Gibbs v Harding

    27 Jul 1869 LR 8 Eq 490, Equity

    25 Jan 1870 LR 5 Ch App 336, CA

    HUSBAND AND WIFEAgreement for SeparationSpecific Performance.
    LORD HATHERLEY, L.C.:— We are not called upon in this case to decide whether there could be an injunction on such an agreement, but only to decree specific performance of an agreement. The Court would not execute an agreement without consideration, or an agreement between husband and wife without the intervention of a trustee, unless the husband and wife were at arm's length, as in the case of Bateman v. Countess of Ross. In Wilson v. Wilson, the agreement was with trustees and the question did not arise. The wife in this case was not a party, though she signed

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies