Skip to Search Facets Skip to Results
Full Search Search Help

Results: 126

  • Wilson v Hart

    28 May 1866 LR 1 Ch App 463, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COVENANT — Covenant running with the land — Covenant not to use House as a Beer-shop

  • In re Cobham (Ex parte Sampson)

    08 Jun 1866 LR 1 Ch App 476, CA

    BANKRUPTCY — Debtor petitioning against himself — Statement of Debts

  • Nunn v Fabian

    09 Nov 1865 LR 1 Ch App 35, CA

    FRAUD — Statute of frauds — Part Performance

  • Moore v Marrable

    23 Jan 1866 LR 1 Ch App 217, CA

    SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE — Agreement for Lease — Substitution of Tenant.
    Jan. 23. SIR J. L. KNIGHT BRUCE, L.J.:— With all deference to the Master of the Rolls, the Plaintiff, in my opinion, has by his acts and conduct so complicated and entangled matters in connection with this house as to render specific performance impossible. SIR J. G. TURNER, L.J.:— The material questions upon this appeal seem to me to be, what was the effect of the agreement of the 12th of October, 1859, and how the case is affected by the conduct of the parties since that date. As to the effect of that agreement, considered simply with reference to

  • Mortimer v Bell

    17 Nov 1865 LR 1 Ch App 10, CA

    VENDOR AND PURCHASER — Sale — Conditions of Sale

  • Rhodes v Bate

    18 Jan 1866 LR 1 Ch App 252, CA

    Subsequent citations: 3.
    UNDUE INFLUENCE — Confidential Relation.
    Jan. 18. SIR G. J. TURNER, L.J., after stating the facts of the case, and referring to the allegations in the bill and the answers, continued:— Much of the evidence on the part of the Plaintiff is directed to her being of weak mind, a point which, in my opinion, is not in issue in this cause, and which, if in issue, is satisfactorily disproved. I have no doubt whatever that the Plaintiff was perfectly competent to understand what she did. The whole of the evidence on the part of the Plaintiff is so discursive that I find great difficulty

  • Williams v Glenton

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 4.

  • In re Imperial Bank of China, India, and Japan

    24 Mar 1866 LR 1 Ch App 339, CA

    COMPANY — Voluntary Winding Up — Amalgamation

  • Hope v Carnegie (No 2)

    22 Feb 1866 LR 1 Ch App 320, CA

    CONFLICT OF LAWS — Foreign suit — Injunction

  • In re Upfill (Ex parte Upfill)

    02 Jun 1866 LR 1 Ch App 439, CA

    BANKRUPTCY — Annulling Adjudication on Equitable Grounds.
    SIR J. L. KNIGHT BRUCE, L.J.:— Two questions are before us — one as to the legal validity or invalidity of the adjudication, the other as to its equitable invalidity on the ground of alleged impropriety of motive. Apart from the alleged impropriety of motive, I think that the learned Commissioner's conclusion is clearly right. The question remains whether sufficient impropriety of motive is established for annulling the adjudication. Now, when all the legal requisites are shewn to exist, it requires a strong case to warrant the annulling the adjudication on the ground of a collateral motive. In the present

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies