Results: 278

• In re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria)

  14 Nov 2012 [2012] EWCA Civ 1475; [2013] 2 FLR 388; [2012] CN 61, CA

  12 Jun 2013 [2013] UKSC 33; [2013] 1 WLR 1911; [2013] 3 All ER 929; [2013] 2 FLR 1075; [2013] WLR (D) 226; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 21 positive; 14 neutral; most recently considered: 2022. Subsequent citations: 370.
  CHILDREN — Care proceedings — Threshold conditions
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Care proceedings — Threshold conditions — Local authority finding child’s parents evasive and obstructive with care team and bringing care proceedings in respect of child — Judge finding threshold criteria established and making care order — Whether child “likely to suffer significant harm” — Whether threshold conditions crossed — Whether order proportionate — Proper approach of appellate court on appeals — Children Act 1989, s 31(2) — Human Rights Act 1998, s 6(1), Sch 1, Pt I, art 8

  7 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  2 Statutes considered

• Minerva Navigation Inc v Oceana Shipping AG (Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities SA, Oceana Shipping AG v Transatlantica Commodities SA, The Athena)

  13 Dec 2012 [2012] EWHC 3608 (Comm); [2013] 2 All ER (Comm) 28; [2013] 1 CLC 226; [2012] CN 244; [2013] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 145, QBD (Walker J)

  23 Oct 2013 [2013] EWCA Civ 1723; [2014] 1 All ER (Comm) 552; [2013] 2 Lloyd's Rep 673; [2013] WLR (D) 406, CA

  07 Apr 2014 Permission to appeal to Supreme Court refused

  SHIPPING — Charterparty — Time charter
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  SHIPPING — Charterparty — Time charter — Construction of off-hire clause in charterparty — Whether vessel off-hire for particular period due to not being efficient for services required for that period — Whether charterers having to further show net loss of time resulting — New York Produce Exchange (NYPE) 1946 form, cl 15

  12 Case(s) considered

  1 Standard Form considered
• Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc (Interflora Inc. and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Ltd.)

  22 May 2009 [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Ch D (Arnold J)

  22 Sep 2010 (Case C-323/09); EU:C:2011:604; [2012] Bus LR 1440; [2011] WLR (D) 281; EU:C:2011:173, EU:C:2011:604, ECJ

  20 Jun 2012 (No 2) [2012] EWHC 1722 (Ch); [2012] FSR 32, Ch D (Arnold J)

  20 Nov 2012 (No 2) [2012] EWCA Civ 1501; [2013] Bus LR D46; [2013] 2 All ER 663; [2012] CN 82, CA

  21 Feb 2013 (No 3) [2013] EWHC 273 (Ch); [2013] CN 268, Ch D (Arnold J)

  15 Apr 2013 (No 4) [2013] EWHC 936 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 183, Ch D (Arnold J)

  21 May 2013 (No 5) [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 206, Ch D (Arnold J)

  12 Jun 2013 (No 6) [2013] EWHC 1484 (Ch); [2013] CN 865, Ch D (Arnold J)

  05 Nov 2014 (No 5) [2014] EWCA Civ 1403; [2015] Bus LR 492; [2014] WLR (D) 473, CA

  14 Nov 2014 (No 6) [2014] EWCA Civ 1448; [2014] CN 2034, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 125.
  TRADE MARK — Proprietor’s rights — Prevention of “use”

  EVIDENCE — Expert evidence — Report

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Injunction

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Proprietor's rights

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Burden of proof

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Appeal
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  TRADE MARK — Proprietor’s rights — Prevention of “use” — Claimants proprietors of trade mark having substantial reputation — Claimants’ competitor selecting trade mark as keyword for internet referencing service — Competitor offering goods and services identical to those covered by trade mark — Whether claimants entitled to prevent use — Circumstances in which proprietor of trade mark with reputation entitled to prevent use of mark as keyword — Council Directive 89/104/EEC, art 5(1)(a), (2) — Council Regulation (EC) 40/94, art 9(1)(a)(c)

  EVIDENCE — Expert evidence — Report — Claimants seeking to adduce academic journals as expert evidence — Whether only admissible in form of expert’s report tendered in accordance with rules — CPR Pt 35

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Injunction — First defendant held to be infringing claimant’s registered trade marks — Form of injunction to restrain further infringement

  TRADE MARK — Proprietor’s rights — Prevention of “use” — First defendant paying search engine to advertise its flower delivery service through keyword advertising — Claimant alleging infringement of trade mark — Whether use of sign deemed to convey single meaning even if understood by different people in different ways — Trade Marks Act 1994, ss 10(1)(2) — Council Directive 89/104/EEC, art 5(1) — Council Regulation 40/94/EC, art 9(1)

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Proprietor's rights — Prevention of “use” — Proprietor’s right to prohibit use of advertising keywords corresponding to competitor’s trademark — Whether evidence of witnesses identified in survey admissible when survey itself not admissible

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Burden of proof — Defendant paying search engine to advertise its flower delivery service through keyword advertising — Advertising appearing in response to entry into search engine of search terms consisting of or comprising word protected by claimants’ trade marks — Claimants alleging infringement of trade marks — Whether reasonably well-informed Internet users able to ascertain without difficulty whether goods or services advertised originating from trade mark proprietor — Whether burden of proof lying on defendant to prove non-infringement — Whether defendant using trade mark by securing flower-related generic terms as keywords — Council Directive 89/104/EEC, art 5(1)(a) — Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94, art 9(1)(a)

  TRADE MARK — Infringement — Appeal — Consequential orders following appeal against finding of infringement — Council Directive 89/104/EEC, art 5(1)(a) — Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94, art 9(1)(a)

  10 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

• Smith v Trafford Housing Trust (Costs)

  23 Nov 2012 [2012] EWHC 3320 (Ch); [2012] CN 125, Ch D (Briggs J)

  Subsequent citations: 22.
  COSTS — Order for — Offer of settlement
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  COSTS — Order for — Offer of settlement — Whether unjust for claimant to pay whole of opposing party’s costs — CPR r 36.14(4)

• R (V) v Commissioner of Police for the City of London

  14 Nov 2012 [2012] EWHC 3430 (Admin); [2012] CN 207, QBD

  POLICE — Powers — Retention of evidence
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  POLICE — Powers — Retention of evidence — Retention of arrest information relating to claimant on police national computer — Whether retention in breach of claimant’s Convention rights — Human Rights Act 1998, Sch 1 Pt I, art 8

• B v A

  10 Dec 2012 [2012] EWHC 3127 (Fam); [2013] 2 FLR 958; [2012] CN 202, Fam D (Charles J)

  Subsequent citations: 5.
  CHILDREN — Custody rights — Breach
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Custody rights — Breach — Father applying for summary return to United States — Without notice applications — Wasted costs order — Principles and procedures to be followed

• R (Long) v Monmouthshire County Council

  08 Nov 2012 [2012] EWHC 3130 (Admin); [2012] CN 13, QBD (Nicola Davies J)

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  PLANNING — Local government planning decision — Environmental impact assessment
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PLANNING — Local government planning decision — Environmental impact assessment — Conservation screening assessment — Whether assessments carried out satisfactorily

• R v Harriott

  07 Nov 2012 [2012] EWCA Crim 2294; [2012] CN 9, CA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  CRIME — Sentence — Confiscation order
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CRIME — Sentence — Confiscation order — Realisable property — Beneficial interest

• Genesis Housing Association Ltd v Liberty Syndicate Management Ltd

  13 Nov 2012 [2012] EWHC 3105 (TCC); [2012] CN 99, QBD (Akenhead J)

  INSURANCE — Warranty — Breach
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  INSURANCE — Warranty — Breach — Basis of contract clause — Defendant insurer claiming contract of insurance void for breach of warranty — Defendant relying on basis of contract clause — Whether defendant entitled to rely on basis clause

• Slater v Condappa

  22 Nov 2012 [2012] EWCA Civ 1506; [2012] CN 120, CA

  TRUST — Constructive Trust — Man and woman forming relationship
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  TRUST — Constructive Trust — Man and woman forming relationship — Property in sole name of male partner prior to relationship — Female partner claiming interest in property on basis male partner agreeing to hold it on common ownership for benefit of both — Whether trust created