Results: 427

• R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal (Public Law Project intervening) (R (C) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Public Law Project intervening), R (U) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Public Law Project intervening))

  01 Dec 2009 [2009] EWHC 3052 (Admin); [2011] QB 120; [2010] 2 WLR 1012; [2010] PTSR 824; [2010] 1 All ER 908; [2010] STC 493, DC

  23 Jul 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 859; [2011] QB 120; [2011] 2 WLR 36; [2011] PTSR 42; [2010] 4 All ER 714; [2010] STC 2556; [2010] WLR (D) 198, CA (Laws LJ, Owen J)

  22 Jun 2011 [2011] UKSC 28; [2012] 1 AC 663; [2011] 3 WLR 107; [2011] PTSR 1053; [2011] 4 All ER 127; [2011] STC 1659; [2012] 1 FLR 997; [2011] WLR (D) 203; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 6 positive; 5 neutral; most recently considered: 2021. Subsequent citations: 158.
  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Special Immigration Appeals Commission

  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Upper Tribunal
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Special Immigration Appeals Commission — Commission “superior court of record” — Commission revoking and refusing bail on basis of closed evidence without disclosing gist to claimants — Decisions unappealable — Whether commission alter ego of High Court — Whether decisions susceptible to judicial review — Whether violating claimants' Convention rights — Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, s 1(3) (as inserted by Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, s 35)

  JUDICIAL REVIEW — Court's jurisdiction — Upper Tribunal — Tribunal “superior court of record” — Tribunal refusing permission to appeal to itself — Decision unappealable — Whether tribunal alter ego of High Court — Whether decision susceptible to judicial review — Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 3(5)

  16 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  2 Statutes considered

• R v Rollins (R v McInerney (Michael))

  09 Oct 2009 [2009] EWCA Crim 1941; [2010] Bus LR 734; [2010] 1 All ER 1183; [2010] 1 Cr App R 14; [2009] WLR (D) 294, CA

  28 Jul 2010 [2010] UKSC 39; [2010] 1 WLR 1922; [2010] Bus LR 1529; [2010] 4 All ER 880; [2011] 1 Cr App R 4; [2010] WLR (D) 210; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent citations: 7.
  FINANCIAL SERVICES — Market abuse — Penalties and injunction
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  FINANCIAL SERVICES — Market abuse — Penalties and injunction — Institution of proceedings — Financial Services Authority — Whether FSA empowered to institute proceedings for criminal offences under statutes other than Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 — Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, ss 1(1), 401, 402 (as amended by Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, Sch 7(7), para 33(4)) — Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, ss 327(1), 328(1) (as amended by Enterprise Act 2002, Sch 2, para 40(17))

  2 Case(s) considered

  4 Statutes considered
• R v Chaytor (R v Devine, R v Morley)

  30 Jul 2010 [2010] EWCA Crim 1910; [2010] 2 Cr App R 394; [2010] WLR (D) 214 {0} {1}, CA

  01 Dec 2010 [2010] UKSC 52; [2011] 1 AC 684; [2010] 3 WLR 1707; [2011] 1 All ER 805; [2011] 1 Cr App R 274; [2010] WLR (D) 311; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 15.
  PARLIAMENT — Privilege — Proceedings in Parliament
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PARLIAMENT — Privilege — Proceedings in Parliament — Members of Parliament submitting claim forms for expenses and allowances under scheme established by House of Commons — Criminal proceedings against members for false accounting in respect of claims — Whether submission of claims “proceedings in Parliament” — Whether claims within exclusive cognisance of Parliament — Whether privilege precluding criminal proceedings — Bill of Rights 1689, art 9

  3 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  1 Statute considered

• Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

  31 Jul 2009 [2009] EWHC 2011 (QB); [2009] IRLR 822, QBD (Nicol J)

  26 May 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 571; [2011] QB 339; [2010] 3 WLR 1285; [2010] ICR 1181; [2010] WLR (D) 135, CA

  14 Dec 2011 [2011] UKSC 58; [2012] 2 AC 22; [2012] 2 WLR 55; [2012] ICR 201; [2012] 2 All ER 278; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent citations: 32.
  EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Breach of contract
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Breach of contract — Summary dismissal on ground of gross misconduct — Employer failing to comply with contractual disciplinary procedure — Employee unable to obtain equivalent post — Whether damages recoverable for breach of contract

  7 Case(s) considered
• Parabola Investments Ltd v Browallia Cal Ltd (formerly Union Cal Ltd)

  06 May 2009 [2009] EWHC 901 (Comm); [2009] 2 All ER (Comm) 589, QBD (Flaux J)

  05 May 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 486; [2011] QB 477; [2010] 3 WLR 1266; [2010] Bus LR 1446; [2011] 1 All ER (Comm) 210; [2010] WLR (D) 114, CA (Mummery, Toulson, Rimer LJJ)

  Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 2 neutral. Subsequent citations: 34.
  DAMAGES — Deceit — Measure of damages
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DAMAGES — Deceit — Measure of damages — Claimant trading stocks and shares through defendant stockbrokers — Trading resulting in disastrous losses concealed by defendant falsely representing to claimant that trading profitable — Claimant's investment fund much depleted before fraud discovered — Claimant thereafter trading profitably with reduced fund — Claimant bringing action in deceit — Whether entitled to damages for lost opportunity to trade with unreduced fund during period from discovery of fraud up to date of trial — Whether discovery of fraud marking cut-off point for damages claim

  5 Case(s) considered
• Bloomsbury International Ltd v Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

  24 Jul 2009 [2009] EWHC 1721 (QB); [2010] 1 CMLR 344, QBD (Hamblen J)

  18 Mar 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 263; [2010] 1 WLR 2117; [2010] 3 All ER 126; [2010] WLR (D) 80, CA (Mummery, Richards, Rimer LJJ)

  15 Jun 2011 (Sea Fish Industry Authority intervening) [2011] UKSC 25; [2011] 1 WLR 1546; [2011] 4 All ER 721; [2011] 3 CMLR 32; [2011] WLR (D) 195; Case details, SC(E) (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers PSC, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance JJSC, Lord Collins of Mapesbury)

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 50.
  FISHERY — Sea fishing — Levy
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  FISHERY — Sea fishing — Levy — Statute empowering levy on sea fish and sea fish products “landed in the United Kingdom” — Subordinate legislation imposing levy on sea fish and sea fish products imported from outside United Kingdom — Whether ultra vires — Whether levy on imported sea fish products charge having equivalent effect to customs duty — Fisheries Act 1981 (as amended by Sea Fish Industry Authority (Levy Powers) Order, art 2), ss 2(1), 4(3), 14(2) — Sea Fish Industry Authority (Levy) Regulations 1995 Confirmatory Order 1996, Sch, para 4 — FEU Treaty, arts 28FEU, 30FEU, 110FEU

  7 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  1 EU Enactment considered

  1 Statute considered

  1 Statutory Instrument considered

• R v W (M)

  02 Mar 2010 [2010] EWCA Crim 372; [2010] QB 787; [2010] 3 WLR 165; [2010] 1 Cr App R 421; [2010] WLR (D) 61, CA

  Subsequent citations: 2.
  CRIME — Common law offence — Misconduct in public office
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CRIME — Common law offence — Misconduct in public office — Police officer incurring personal expenditure on publicly funded credit card charged with misconduct in public office — Elements of offence — Whether dishonesty essential ingredient of offence

  2 Case(s) considered
• NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina

  29 Jan 2009 [2009] EWHC 110 (Comm); [2009] QB 579; [2009] 2 WLR 1332; [2009] 1 All ER (Comm) 697; [2009] 1 Lloyd's Rep 378, QBD

  04 Feb 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 41; [2011] QB 8; [2010] 3 WLR 874; [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 1206; [2010] 2 Lloyd's Rep 442; [2010] WLR (D) 28, CA

  06 Jul 2011 [2011] UKSC 31; [2011] 2 AC 495; [2011] 3 WLR 273; [2011] 4 All ER 1191; [2012] 1 All ER (Comm) 1081; [2011] 2 Lloyd's Rep 628; [2011] WLR (D) 220; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 4 positive; 1 neutral; 2 negative; most recently considered: 2021. Subsequent citations: 51.
  INTERNATIONAL LAW — State immunity — Foreign judgment

  PRACTICE — Claim form — Service out of jurisdiction
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  INTERNATIONAL LAW — State immunity — Foreign judgment — Claimant obtaining New York judgment against foreign state in respect of default on bonds — Claimant bringing claim in England for enforcement of New York judgment — Whether proceedings in England “relating to … a commercial transaction” — Statutory provision allowing for recognition of judgment of foreign court where court would have had jurisdiction on basis of rules applicable in United Kingdom — Whether provision jurisdictional — Whether applicable only if statutory exception to state immunity applying — Whether terms of bond amounting to submission to English jurisdiction — State Immunity Act 1978, ss 1, 2, 3(1) — Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, s 31(1)

  PRACTICE — Claim form — Service out of jurisdiction — Claimant seeking to serve proceedings on foreign state — Claimant pleading state not immune from suit — Basis of contention legally flawed — Whether procedural error capable of remedy — Whether discretion to permit claimant to argue new bases for jurisdiction — CPR rr 3.10, 6.20(9)

  10 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  2 Statutes considered

  1 Statutory Instrument considered
• R (E) v Governing Body of JFS (United Synagogue intervening) (R (E) v Schools Adjudicator (British Humanist Association intervening))

  03 Jul 2008 [2008] EWHC 1535 (Admin); [2008] EWHC 1536 (Admin); [2008] ELR 445, QBD (Munby J)

  25 Jun 2009 [2009] EWCA Civ 626; [2009] PTSR 1442; [2009] 4 All ER 375; [2009] WLR (D) 209, CA (Sedley, Smith, Rimer LJJ)

  16 Dec 2009 [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 2 AC 728; [2010] 2 WLR 153; [2010] PTSR 147; [2010] 1 All ER 319; [2009] WLR (D) 366; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 3 positive; 1 neutral; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 94.
  DISCRIMINATION — Race — Less favourable treatment

  EDUCATION — School — Admissions
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DISCRIMINATION — Race — Less favourable treatment — Oversubscribed Jewish school giving priority to children recognised as Jewish by birth or Orthodox conversion irrespective of religious practice — School refusing to admit child of mother converted through non-Orthodox teaching — Whether unlawful discrimination on racial grounds — Race Relations Act 1976, s 1(1)(a), (1A) (as inserted by Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2003, reg 3)

  EDUCATION — School — Admissions — Faith school's oversubscription policy — Priority for children designated as Jewish by birth or Orthodox conversion irrespective of religious practice — School refusing to admit child of mother converted through non-Orthodox teaching — Whether unlawful discrimination on racial grounds — Race Relations Act 1976, s 1(1)(a), (1A) (as inserted by Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2003, reg 3)

  DISCRIMINATION — Race — Less favourable treatment — Oversubscribed Jewish school giving priority to children recognised as Jewish by birth or Orthodox conversion irrespective of religious practice — School refusing to admit child of mother converted through non-Orthodox teaching — Whether unlawful discrimination on racial grounds — Race Relations Act 1976 (as amended by Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2003, regs 3, 4 and Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2008, reg 2), ss 1(1)(a)(1A), 3

  EDUCATION — School — Admissions — Faith school's oversubscription policy — Priority for children designated as Jewish by birth or Orthodox conversion irrespective of religious practice — School refusing to admit child of mother converted through non-Orthodox teaching — Whether unlawful discrimination on racial grounds — Race Relations Act 1976 (as amended by Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2003, regs 3, 4 and Race Relations Act 1976 (Amendment) Regulations 2008, reg 2), ss 1(1)(a)(1A), 3

  9 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered

• Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin

  27 Jul 2010 [2010] EWCA Civ 868; [2010] 1 WLR 2254; [2011] PTSR 103 {0} {1}, CA

  24 Mar 2011 (appn all) [2011] 1 WLR 920; [2011] PTSR 579, SC(E)

  25 Jul 2012 [2012] UKSC 39; [2012] 1 WLR 2295; [2012] PTSR 1272; [2012] 4 All ER 867; [2012] WLR (D) 224; Case details, SC(E)

  Subsequent citations: 3.
  HOUSING — Secure tenancy — Death of tenant
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HOUSING — Secure tenancy — Death of tenant — Local housing authority granting periodic tenancy to husband and wife as joint tenants — Husband subsequently leaving property while wife and daughter continuing to reside in it as only and main residence — On wife’s death authority serving notice to quit on husband as surviving sole tenant and claiming possession against daughter — Whether wife’s death giving daughter statutory right to succeed to tenancy — Whether authority entitled to possession — Housing Act 1985 (as amended by Housing Act 1996, ss 141(1), 222, Sch 14, para 1, Sch 18, para 10 and Civil Partnership Act 2004, ss 81, 261(4), Sch 8, paras 20, 21(2), 22(2)(3), Sch 30, para 1) ss 87, 88(1), 89

  2 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered