Results: 109

  • Clark & Son v Cullen

    22 Jun 1882 9 QBD 355, DC

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    PRACTICEJudgment against FirmPartners
  • The Prison Commissioners v The Clerk Of The Peace For Middlesex

    01 May 1882 9 QBD 506, CA

    PRISONLand bought for the purpose of rendering Prison more commodious or safePrison Commissioners
  • In Re An Arbitration Between Walker & Son, and Brown

    07 Jun 1882 9 QBD 434, DC

    ARBITRATIONSubmission“Costs of Reference”
  • Harris v Trueman

    04 Jul 1881 7 QBD 340, DC

    03 Apr 1882 9 QBD 264, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 2.
    PRINCIPAL AND AGENTProperty, passing of, in Goods bought by AgentTrustee
  • Coomber, v The Justices Of Berks

    24 Mar 1882 9 QBD 17, DC

    21 Dec 1882 10 QBD 267, CA

    REVENUEIncome taxJustices
  • The School Attendance Committee Of Belper Union v Bailey

    28 Apr 1882 9 QBD 259, DC

    EDUCATIONElementary educationEducation Acts, 1870, 1876, and 1880; 33 & 34 Vict. c. 75; 39 & 40 Vict. c. 79; 43 & 44 Vict. c. 23
  • Clack v Wood

    09 Jun 1882 9 QBD 276, CA

    PRACTICEPower of Court of Appeal to amend Record of TrialRules of Court, Orders LVIII. r. 5; LIX. r. 2
  • Mersey Steel and Iron Co v Naylor

    13 Jun 1882 9 QBD 648, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 31.
    CONTRACTRescission of ContractRefusal to be Bound
  • Quilter v Mapleson

    19 Jun 1882 9 QBD 672, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 2 negative. Subsequent citations: 9.
    LANDLORD AND TENANTRelief against ForfeitureConveyancing and Law of Property Act, 1881 (44 & 45 Vict. c. 41), s. 14
  • Baldwin & Co v The London, Chatham, and Dover Railway Co

    08 Aug 1882 9 QBD 582, DC

    CARRIERLiability for Delay in Transmission of GoodsMeasure of Damage.
    MATHEW, J. I think the decision of the county court judge was quite right. The true measure of damages in a case of this kind is that which may fairly be said to have been in the contemplation of the parties at the time us the natural consequence of a breach of contract on the part of the defendants. The goods in question were not delivered or tendered to the consignees until fourteen days after the time at which they ought to have been delivered. What were the natural or necessary damages resulting from that delay? If the rags had

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies