Results: 119

  • Berry v The Exchange Trading Co

    17 Dec 1875 1 QBD 77, DC

    PRACTICESupreme Court of Judicature Act, 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 77), Schedule, Order LIII., rules 2, 3Failure to appear in Court, after giving Notice of Motion
  • The Queen v The Inhabitants Of Greenhow

    10 May 1876 1 QBD 703, DC

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    HIGHWAYIndictment for Non-repairLandslip covering Part of Highway
  • Pulbrook v Lawes

    19 Jan 1876 1 QBD 284, DC

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    CONTRACTAgreement for leaseStatute of Frauds
  • The Queen v Berry

    20 May 1876 1 QBD 447, Crown Cases Reserved

    CRIMEDeaf muteIncapacity to understand Proceedings at Trial for Felony.
    KELLY, C.B. This case may be determined both on authority and principle. An authority which has never been overruled or doubted is to be found in Reg. v. Pritchard, where a person, deaf and dumb, was to be tried for a capital felony before Alderson, B., who ordered a jury to be impanelled to try whether he was mute by the visitation of God; the jury found that he was so. The jury were then sworn to try whether he was able to plead, which they found in the affirmative, and the prisoner by a sign pleaded not guilty. The
  • De Hart v Stevenson

    23 Feb 1876 1 QBD 313, DC

    PRACTICEParties to ActionOne Person suing for others having same interest
  • Swire v Redman and Holt

    04 Jul 1876 1 QBD 536, QBD

    Subsequent citations: 4.
    DEBTTwo joint debtors, right of, as against creditor with notice, to be treated as principal and surety.
    July 4. COCKBURN, C.J. I will proceed to read the judgment in this case prepared by my Brother Blackburn, in which I fully concur. In this action, tried before Baron Bramwell, the defendant Holt made no defence; and the action was tried between the plaintiff and Redman, who defended. After the evidence for the plaintiffs had been completed, Mr. Benjamin stated the defendant Redman's case; but the learned Judge ruled that, supposing that the facts opened should be proved, there was no case for the defendant to go to the jury; and he directed a verdict for the amount claimed,
  • The Queen v Cresswell

    29 Jan 1876 1 QBD 446, Crown Cases Reserved

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    MARRIAGEBigamyFirst Marriage celebrated elsewhere than in a Church
  • Sugg v Silber (No 1)

    10 Apr 1876 1 QBD 362, DC

    PRACTICEJudicature act, 1873, ss. 56, 57Order XXXVI., Rules 2, 3, 5, 6, 26
  • Thomas v Brown

    26 May 1876 1 QBD 714, DC

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 9.
    FRAUDStatute of fraudsVendor and Purchaser
  • The Queen On The Prosecution Of Hargraves v Steel

    14 Feb 1876 1 QBD 482, DC

    COSTSInformation for Libel6 & 7 Vict. c. 96, s. 8

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies