Results: 88

  • The Queen v Pearson

    15 Feb 1870 LR 5 QB 237, QBD

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    JUSTICESJurisdictionSummary Conviction on Charge of Assault
  • Ex parte Short

    27 Jan 1870 LR 5 QB 174, QBD

    LICENSINGWine and beerhouse act, 1869 (32 & 33 vict. c. 27), s. 17Previous Conviction
  • Woodward v Buchanan

    12 Jan 1870 LR 5 QB 285, QBD

    EVIDENCERelevancy to IssueEvidence to charge Defendant with Work done by Plaintiff to Houses, that the Defendant had given Orders to other other Persons about same Houses.
    MELLOR, J. We are all satisfied that the judge was right in receiving the evidence. It is argued that the evidence was collateral to the issue. No doubt in the cases referred to the evidence was collateral; but here the real question was, were the houses being built for the defendant, and were the goods supplied for him? It was, therefore, perfectly legitimate to shew that other tradesmen had supplied goods by the defendant's orders for the same houses. Had the evidence applied to other houses, the authorities might be in point against the admissibility of the evidence. LUSH and
  • West London Extension Railway Co v Fulham

    12 May 1870 LR 5 QB 361, QBD

    ARBITRATIONAwardReference under 12 & 13 Vict. c. 45, s. 13
  • North of England Iron Steamship Insurance Assocn v Armstrong

    21 Jan 1870 LR 5 QB 244, QBD

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral.
    INSURANCEMarine InsuranceValued Policy
  • Oake v Moorecroft

    15 Nov 1869 LR 5 QB 76, QBD

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PRACTICEAppearance to Writ by Defendant in PersonCommon Law Procedure Act, 1852 (15 & 16 Vict. c. 76), ss. 30, 31.
    COCKBURN, C.J. I am of opinion this rule should be made absolute. Whatever may originally have been the reasons of compelling a defendant to answer according to the exigency of the writ in person, they have now passed away. Now, in entering an appearance in person, all that is required is that a memorandum be handed in, stating that the defendant appears in person, and giving his address; and this address is only required in order that the plaintiff may know where to leave subsequent proceedings and documents in the cause; and it seems to me, that to require that
  • Berry v Henderson

    14 Feb 1870 LR 5 QB 296, QBD

    PHARMACYPharmacy act, 1868 (31 & 32 vict. c. 121), s. 17Sale of “Poison”
  • Spurr v Cass (Cass v Spurr)

    21 Jun 1870 LR 5 QB 656, QBD

    PRACTICENon-joinder of plaintiffsAction by one on Contract by two for Benefit of one
  • Foster v Tucker

    14 Feb 1870 LR 5 QB 224, QBD

    HIGHWAYTurnpikeExemption from Toll
  • Jones v Whittaker

    08 Jun 1870 LR 5 QB 541, QBD

    LICENSINGExciseable liquorBeer

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies