Results: 100

  • Thurlow v Mackeson

    26 Nov 1868 LR 4 QB 97, QBD

    MORTGAGEMortgagor and MortgageePower of Sale, how duly exercised.
    LUSH, J. As we are clearly of opinion that the power of sale was duly exercised by the defendant, it is unnecessary to go into the second question as to the construction of the covenant in the deed of 1859. The question is whether the power given by the mortgagor to sell in case of default was duly and bonâ fide carried out by the mortgagee. If it was, then the mortgagor's right to redeem was barred. Now, that power is given in very extensive terms, and is not fettered by any such conditions as Mr. Williams suggests, or by
  • R (on the Prosecution of the overseers of St Mary, Cardiff) v Rhymney Railway Co

    15 Feb 1869 LR 4 QB 276, QBD

    POORPoor-rateRateability of Occupier of Wharf for Wharfage Dues received by others.
    Feb. 15. The judgment of the Court (Cockburn, C.J., Mellor, Hannen, and Hayes, JJ.) was delivered by MELLOR, J. The question raised and argued in this case was whether the appellants, the Rhymney Railway Company, as occupiers of the wharves, are liable to be rated in respect of the wharfage rates or dues paid for coal and other goods shipped and unshipped at the wharves occupied by the appellants, and we are of opinion that they are liable to be so rated. These wharfage rates or dues are perfectly distinct from the rates or dues payable in respect of vessels
  • Elston v Rose

    12 Nov 1868 LR 4 QB 4, QBD

    PRACTICECounty court, jurisdiction of, in ejectment“Value of Tenements” in County Courts Act, 1867 (30 & 31 Vict. c. 142), s. 11
  • Hyams v Webster

    26 Feb 1867 LR 2 QB 264, QBD

    26 Nov 1868 LR 4 QB 138, Ex Ct

    NEGLIGENCEHighwayMetropolitan Board of Works, Liability of, for Subsidence in Highway
  • Bissell v Jones

    06 Nov 1868 LR 4 QB 49, QBD

    DEBTDebtor and creditorDeed of Composition
  • R (on the prosecution of William Cook) v William Wood

    07 Jun 1869 LR 4 QB 559, QBD

    FOOD AND DRUGSBread, sale of, otherwise than by weightBread “usually sold” as French or Fancy Bread
  • Taylor v Chester

    20 Apr 1869 LR 4 QB 309, QBD

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 8.
    PLEDGEBailmentImmoral Consideration
  • The Queen v Vaughan

    09 Nov 1868 LR 4 QB 190, QBD

    RAILWAYRailway companyCompensation
  • Shepherd v Harrison

    15 Jan 1869 LR 4 QB 196, QBD

    11 May 1869 LR 4 QB 493, Ex Ct

    AGENCYPrincipal and agent to buyConsignor and Consignee
  • R (on the prosecution of the Great Western Railway Co v Inhabitants Of Llantrissant

    24 Apr 1869 LR 4 QB 354, QBD

    POORPoor-rateRailway

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies