Results: 105

  • Dignam v Baily

    17 Jan 1868 LR 3 QB 178, QBD

    DEBTDebtor and creditorSheriff
  • Lebel v Tucker

    27 Nov 1867 LR 3 QB 77, QBD

    BILL OF EXCHANGEIndorsee against AcceptorContract of Acceptor of English Bill
  • Powell v Howells

    23 Jun 1868 LR 3 QB 654, QBD

    WILLDevise, Construction ofImplication of Cross-remainders.
    BLACKBURN, J. I think, taking the words of the will and applying to them the proper rule of construction, that their effect is that the plaintiff is entitled to recover one-third of a moiety of the property. I think the testatrix left the property to the three Powells in equal shares, with cross-remainders between them, and it was her intention that the remainder to Mary Powell should not take effect until the preceding cross-remainders had been exhausted. If the codicil had stopped after the word “issue,” and the words “of any of them” were omitted, then it is clear the
  • Sweetman v Guest

    22 Jan 1868 LR 3 QB 262, QBD

    JUSTICESJustices, jurisdiction ofProceedings to enforce Rate by Warrant of Distress
  • Deal v Schofield

    09 Nov 1867 LR 3 QB 8, QBD

    LICENSINGBeer act (3 & 4 vict. c. 61), s. 13“Selling Beer to be Consumed on the Premises.”
  • Garnett v Backhouse

    13 Nov 1867 LR 3 QB 30, QBD

    FISHERYSalmon fishery act, 1861 (24 & 25 vict. c. 109), ss. 4, 12Salmon Fishery Act, 1865 (28 & 29 Vict. c. 121), s. 42
  • The Queen v Hamilton

    12 Jun 1868 LR 3 QB 718, QBD

    POLICESpecial constables, order for expenses ofJurisdiction of Justices of Petty Sessional Division
  • Burke v Dublin Trunk Connecting Railway Co (Miller's case, Kernaghan v Same Company, Jame's case, Marley's case)

    07 Nov 1867 LR 3 QB 47, QBD

    COMPANYScire facias against Shareholder8 Vict. c. 16, s. 36
  • North Eastern Railway Co v Mayor of Tynemouth

    03 Jul 1868 LR 3 QB 723, QBD

    PUBLIC HEALTHPublic health act, 1848 (11 & 12 vict. c. 63), s. 10Power of General Board of Health in applying parts of the Act to a district.
    July 3. The judgment of the Court (Cockburn, C.J., Blackburn and Lush, JJ.) was delivered by LUSH, J. The rate appealed against is assessed upon the full annual value of such part of the appellants' railway as lies in the township of Tynemouth, and upon two thirds of the annual value of that part which lies in the township of Chirton (including in each case the stations, dwelling-houses, warehouses, sheds, and the other adjuncts of a railway), and the appellants contend that they are entitled to the benefit of the proviso to the 88th sect. of the General Health Act
  • Ex parte Beal

    23 Apr 1868 LR 3 QB 387, QBD

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COPYRIGHTCopyright in works of the fine arts25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, ss. 4, 6

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies