Skip to Search Facets Skip to Results
Full Search Search Help

Results: 95

  • Unwin v Clarke

    28 Apr 1866 LR 1 QB 417, QBD

    MASTER AND SERVANT — Absenting from service — Lawful excuse (4 Geo. 4, c. 34, s. 3)

  • The Queen v Lambarde

    07 May 1866 LR 1 QB 388, QBD

    FRIENDLY SOCIETY — 21 & 22 Vict. c. 101, s. 5 — Duty of Justices to state a case under 20 & 21 vict. c. 43.
    SHEE, J. I am of opinion that this case is within the provisions of 20 & 21 Vict. c. 43, and therefore the justices are bound to state a case.

  • Lloyd v Jackson

    13 Jun 1866 LR 1 QB 571, QBD

    02 Feb 1867 LR 2 QB 269, Ex Ct

    WILL — Devise without words of inheritance, when it gives an estate in fee — Introductory words, “as touching such worldly estate wherewith it hath pleased God to bless me”

  • Balls v Metropolitan Board Of Works

    29 Jan 1866 LR 1 QB 337, QBD

    LAND — Lands clauses consolidation act, 1845 (8 vict. c. 18), ss. 51 & 68 — Lands injuriously affected

  • The Queen v Stone

    31 May 1866 LR 1 QB 529, QBD

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    LAND — Lands clauses consolidation act (8 vict. c. 18), ss. 18, 121 — Compensation

  • Le Conteur v London and South Western Railway Co

    14 Nov 1865 LR 1 QB 54, QBD

    CARRIER — Carriers Act (11 Geo. 4 & 1 Wm. 4, c. 68) — Contract to carry partly by land and partly by sea.
    COCKBURN, C.J. On consideration we think it unnecessary to call upon the defendants' counsel. When the case was first opened I had imagined that the facts were such, as to lead to the necessary inference that the plaintiff had taken possession of the chronometer, withdrawing it from the custody of the company, and keeping it in his own personal custody and charge; but I think my first impression was incorrect. I think it appears that what took place was this, that by the desire of the plaintiff, the porter of the company placed this article in a carriage, in which

  • Smith v Redding

    04 May 1866 LR 1 QB 489, QBD

    LICENSING — Beer-house — Hours for keeping open

  • Hewitt v Hewitt

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive.

  • Atkinson v Fosbroke

    11 Jun 1866 LR 1 QB 628, QBD

    PRACTICE — Interrogatories in Action of Slander — Common Law Procedure Act, 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 125), s. 51.
    COCKBURN, C.J. I am of opinion that this rule should be discharged. I think the order of my Brother Blackburn was rightly made. I quite agree that in exercising the jurisdiction conferred upon the courts of common law by the Common Law Procedure Act, 1854, to administer interrogatories, we ought to take care that we exercise it only in favour of a party who really has a case, but is obliged to resort to the other side to make out that case. We ought not, therefore, to allow what have been called mere fishing interrogatories; but I think in the

  • Saunders v Baldy

    11 Nov 1865 LR 1 QB 87, QBD

    GAME — 1 & 2 Will. 4, c. 32, ss. 3 & 23 — Taking game out of season without a certificate.
    COCKBURN, C.J. I am of opinion that the justices ought to have convicted the respondent. I see no reason why a man should not be liable to two penalties for the two offences — one against the laws for preservation of game, and one against the revenue, no matter at what season of the year. I think the respondent was guilty of the offence charged, inasmuch as he used an engine for the purpose of killing game without a certificate. LUSH, J. I am of the same opinion. The penalties in the two sections are cumulative.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies