Results: 28

• Johnstone v Johnstone

  11 Jan 1929 [1929] P 165, CA

  DIVORCE — Practice — Costs
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DIVORCE — Practice — Costs — Wife's Petition for Divorce — Appearance by Husband under Protest — Denial of Jurisdiction — Issue directed — Liability of Husband to pay and give Security for Wife's Costs of Issue — Interlocutory Proceeding — “Other good cause” for not ordering Security — Matrimonial Causes Rules, 1924, r. 91 — Inherent Jurisdiction of Court.

  1 Statutory Instrument considered

• The Vectis

  10 Apr 1929 [1929] P 204, DC

  SHIPPING — Damage — Contact with Anchor in improper Position
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  SHIPPING — Damage — Contact with Anchor in improper Position — Navigation of Milton Creek, River Swale — Milton Creek By-laws.

• Prinsep v Prinsep

  26 Mar 1929 [1929] P 225, PDA

  Subsequent citations: 9.
  DIVORCE — Post-nuptial Settlement on the Spouses or either of them — Application of Settled Funds
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DIVORCE — Post-nuptial Settlement on the Spouses or either of them — Application of Settled Funds — Powers of the Court — Definition of Settlement — Judicature Act, 1925 (15 & 16 Geo. 5, c. 49), s. 192.

  1 Statute considered

• Hauxton Parochial Church Council v Stevens

  20 Oct 1928 [1929] P 240, Const Ct

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Repair of Chancel of Parish Church — Liability of Impropriator
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Repair of Chancel of Parish Church — Liability of Impropriator — No Notice in Conveyance.

• Janion and Janion

  29 Nov 1926 [1929] P 237, Admiralty

  On this report coming on for confirmation Lord Merrivale P. delivered a judgment on November 29, 1926, in the course of which, after dealing with the facts and reciting the trusts of the settlement, as set out in the judgment in the present case, he proceeded to discuss the question of jurisdiction as follows: “Counsel for the husband said that this settlement was what is called a spendthrift settlement intended to prevent an impulsive young man from making away with his property, and it is said that that being manifest or appearing upon evidence to be the motive which operated
  Expand

  1 Statute considered

• In The Estate of James and Marion Christie Bordass

  29 Oct 1928 [1929] P 107, PDA

  ADMINISTRATION — Settled Land — Land settled previously to Death of Tenant for Life
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ADMINISTRATION — Settled Land — Land settled previously to Death of Tenant for Life — Determination of Settlement on Death of Tenant for Life Intestate — General Grant of Administration to Estate of Tenant for Life made to Remainderman under Settlement — Citations.

• Webb v Webb

  21 Jan 1929 [1929] P 159, PDA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  DIVORCE — Variation of Marriage Settlement — Guilty Husband
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DIVORCE — Variation of Marriage Settlement — Guilty Husband — No Issue — Interest of Husband in Settled Fund of Wife in event of his surviving — Ultimate Trust of Residue of Fund of Wife for her Next of Kin — Interest of Next of Kin preserved — Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925 (15 & 16 Geo. 5, c. 49), s. 192.

  1 Statute considered

• The Tovarisch

  25 Jul 1929 [1929] P 293, PDA

  06 Dec 1929 [1930] P 1, CA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  SHIPPING — Collision — Flare-up Light
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  SHIPPING — Collision — Flare-up Light — Green pyrotechnic Light — Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1910, arts. 1, 12.

  2 Statutory Instruments considered

• Prinsep v Prinsep

  01 Jul 1929 [1929] P 265, PDA

  The Court (HILL J.) now approved the following minutes of order:— Trustee: The Public Trustee. Trust fund 40,000l. Securities to this value to be transferred. Usual powers to vary investments. The trustee to hold the trust fund upon the following trusts:— (a) Upon trust during Mr. Prinsep's lifetime, to apply the income for the maintenance, support, etc., of Mr. Prinsep and any wife and issue of his (other than Jane Prinsep, the child). (b) After the death of Mr. Prinsep then subject to any appointment of life interest to a wife, in trust both as to capital and income for
  Expand

  3 Statutes considered
• Vigon v Vigon and Kunther

  21 Dec 1928 [1929] P 157, PDA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 1.
  DIVORCE — Practice — Custody of Child
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DIVORCE — Practice — Custody of Child — Previous Order of Court of Summary Jurisdiction — Variation of Order — Guardianship of Infants Acts, 1886 and 1925 (49 & 50 Vict. c. 27, and 15 & 16 Geo. 5, c. 45).

  1 Statute considered