Results: 47

  • Hook v Hook and Brown (The King’s Proctor Showing Cause)

    26 Jan 1917 [1917] P 56, PDA

    DIVORCEAdultery of Petitioner (Husband) undisclosedIgnorance of Law and Practice
  • The Achilles

    26 Jul 1917 [1917] P 218, PDA

    ADMIRALTYPrize courtEnemy Goods
  • Gregson v Taylor

    22 May 1917 [1917] P 256, PDA

    Subsequent citations: 8.
    PROBATEWillStriking out Words
  • The Sydland and The Indianic

    31 Jul 1916 [1917] P 161, HC

    July 31. THE PRESIDENT (SIR SAMUEL EVANS), after reviewing the facts, said: “As to the claim put forward by or in the name of Alamo as neutral owner of the goods, there is no evidence of any value to support it. The onus of proving a neutral interest rests in the claimant. My conclusion is that the claim is entirely devoid of foundation, and it must be disallowed. That is enough to dispose of the case. There is no other claimant before the Court, and the goods can be condemned: see Prize Rules and The Schooner Adeline. “Proceeding to another
  • The Frederik VIII

    18 Dec 1916 [1917] P 43, PDA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    ADMIRALTYPrize court“Goods” or “Commodities”
  • The Sigurd

    18 Oct 1917 [1917] P 250, PDA

    ADMIRALTYPrize courtSeizure of Cargo under Reprisals Order in Council of March 11, 1915
  • Butler v Butler (No 10)

    06 Jul 1917 [1917] P 244, DC

    DIVORCEDesertionSummary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act, 1895 (58 & 59 Vict. c. 39)
  • The Jessie and The Zaanland

    09 May 1917 [1917] P 138, PDA

    ADMIRALTYCollisionSteamship lying to one Anchor broken adrift by Steamship under Way
  • The Balto

    05 Mar 1917 [1917] P 79, PDA

    ADMIRALTYPrize courtContraband
  • The Kronprinsessan Margareta

    19 Mar 1917 [1917] P 114, PDA

    ADMIRALTYPrize courtContraband

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies