Results: 37

  • The Duc D’Aumale

    01 Dec 1902 [1903] P 18, CA

    ADMIRALTYCollisionAction in Personam
  • In The Goods of Baldwin

    17 Dec 1902 [1903] P 61, PDA

    ADMINISTRATIONAdministration, with will annexedSpecific Legatee
  • Baxter, In the goods of

    24 Nov 1902 [1903] P 12, PDA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 3.
    WILLNomination PaperIndustrial and Provident Societies Act, 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 39), s. 25, sub-ss. 1, 2.
    GORELL BARNES J. In my judgment, this document is testamentary. It fails, under the provisions of the Industrial Societies Act, 1893, to operate as a nomination paper. Under that Act, a member of I the society may, by writing under his hand, nominate a person or persons to whom his interest in the society is to go after his death, provided the amount credited to him in the books of the society does not then — that is, at the time he executes the nomination — exceed 100l. sterling. I am told that it did exceed that sum, and that
  • Attwood (Otherwise Pomeroy) v Attwood

    12 Aug 1902 [1903] P 7, PDA

    MARRIAGENullity suitDecree
  • The Koning Willem I (No 1)

    08 Apr 1903 [1903] P 114, PDA

    ADMIRALTYCollisionFog
  • Constantinidi v Constantinidi and Lance

    10 Aug 1903 [1903] P 246, PDA

    05 Jul 1905 [1905] P 253, CA

    HUSBAND AND WIFEDissolution of marriageWife's Adultery
  • In The Goods of William John Cory

    19 Jan 1903 [1903] P 62, PDA

    ADMINISTRATIONSpecial CircumstancesSureties dispensed with.
    JEUNE P. I am inclined to think in this special case I may grant administration in the ordinary way, taking the applicant's own bond and not requiring sureties. I cannot strain the power of the Court so far as to say I have any jurisdiction to direct or control or suggest anything with regard to the administration of this property, beyond granting administration in due course of law. I have no power to direct or give leave to the widow to carry on the business as administratrix in a particular way. But, under the circumstances, I am persuaded that it
  • The Marguerite Molinos

    01 Apr 1903 [1903] P 160, PDA

    ADMIRALTYSalvageInformation by one Person leading to a Salvage Service by another Person
  • Eyre v Eyre (Booker and Eyre Intervening)

    13 Mar 1903 [1903] P 131, PDA

    WILLWill and codicilsIncorporation.
    March 31. BUCKNILL J. In this case the plaintiffs, who sue as executors of George Lewis Phipps Eyre, deceased, claim to have admitted to probate two documents, being respectively a draft will of 1897, described as document “A” in the pleadings, and a codicil dated February 20, 1902, described as document “B.” The claim of the plaintiffs is put alternatively: Firstly, that the document referred to in the codicil of February 20, 1902, as the last will of the deceased was in existence at the time when the deceased executed the codicil, and was never revoked by him, but has
  • E v E (Otherwise T)

    02 Mar 1903 [1903] P 88, PDA

    NULLITYVariation of SettlementOrder

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies