Results: 43

• The Uskmoor

  09 Jul 1902 [1902] P 250, PDA

  ADMIRALTY — Collision — Sound Signals for Vessels in sight of one another
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ADMIRALTY — Collision — Sound Signals for Vessels in sight of one another — “Course authorized or required by these Rules” — Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1897, art. 28.

  1 Statutory Instrument considered

• Gattward v Knee

  10 Dec 1901 [1902] P 99, PDA

  PROBATE — Soldier's Will — Wills Act (1 Vict. c. 26), s. 11.
  JEUNE P. I am clearly of opinion that this paper is a testamentary disposition. Cases are sometimes met with that run rather close on the point as to whether certain words of contingency limit the operation of a particular document, and are intended to make it conditional under certain circumstances. In the present instance, the phrase “if I am killed in action” appears to me to be only the general expression which a man may use if he is going into danger. All this man meant was This shall take effect if I die. I am satisfied that he did
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PROBATE — Soldier's Will — Wills Act (1 Vict. c. 26), s. 11.

  1 Statute considered
• Roberts v Brennan

  24 Mar 1902 [1902] P 143, PDA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 1.
  MARRIAGE — Nullity suit — Matrimonial Residence
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  MARRIAGE — Nullity suit — Matrimonial Residence — Jurisdiction.

• The Auguste Legembre

  28 Feb 1902 [1902] P 123, PDA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  ADMIRALTY — Salvage — Reward
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ADMIRALTY — Salvage — Reward — Tug engaged by salving Tug — Lifeboat Tug towing salved Vessel — Right of Lifeboat Crew to participate.

• Kirk v Kirk

  05 May 1902 [1902] P 145, PDA

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Permanent maintenance — Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857 (20 & 21 Vict. c. 85), s. 32
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Permanent maintenance — Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857 (20 & 21 Vict. c. 85), s. 32 — Gross Sum — Payment to Petitioner.

  1 Statute considered

• The Assunta

  28 Apr 1902 [1902] P 150, PDA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  ADMIRALTY — Practice — Parties
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ADMIRALTY — Practice — Parties — Action in Rem — Writ — “Co-partners” — “Owners” — Misdescription of Plaintiff — Rules of Supreme Court, 1883, Order XLVIII. A, r. 1 — Irregularity — Fresh Step — Order LXX., rr. 1, 2.

  2 Statutory Instruments considered

• In The Goods of Bramley

  09 Dec 1901 [1902] P 106, PDA

  WILL — Construction — “The rest of my Money”
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  WILL — Construction — “The rest of my Money” — Other Property.

• Twist v Tye

  19 Dec 1901 [1902] P 92, PDA

  Subsequent citations: 3.
  PROBATE — Practice — Costs
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PROBATE — Practice — Costs — Executors.

• Kent v Kent

  29 Jan 1902 [1902] P 108, PDA

  WILL — Wills — Power of Appointment
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  WILL — Wills — Power of Appointment — Exercise by Will — Subsequent Will — No Clause of Revocation — No Reference to Power — “Give, Devise, Bequeath, and Appoint” — Power held to be exercised — First Will excluded from Probate.

• Blackett v Blackett and Frail

  30 Apr 1902 [1902] P 170, CA

  PRACTICE — Divorce — Bankrupt Petitioner
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PRACTICE — Divorce — Bankrupt Petitioner — Claim for Damages — Security for Costs.