Skip to Search Facets Skip to Results
Full Search Search Help

Results: 62

  • Euston v Smith (Falsely Called Euston)

    15 Jan 1884 9 PD 57, PDA

    PRACTICE — Nullity — Interrogatories.
    SIR J. HANNEN (President). I find it to be in accordance with the practice in the Divorce Division to allow interrogatories, and I shall continue to follow that practice.

  • The Mammoth

    17 Jun 1884 9 PD 126, PDA

    PRACTICE — Printing — Order LXVI., r. 7

  • The Avenir

    09 Apr 1884 9 PD 84, PDA

    PRACTICE — Default of appearance — Order XIII., rr. 12, 13.
    BUTT, J. The plaintiff must wait for the full time which the defendant might have had in which to plead and he must also give the notice of trial in the registry. It is very undesirable to seize and sell ships in great haste, and there should be plenty of time allowed between the seizure and sale. As to giving a conditional judgment now, I cannot consent to do so. April 21. The application was renewed, and the times having elapsed and notice of trial having been given, the President gave judgment for the plaintiff.

  • In The Goods of W G Smart, Deceased

    26 Feb 1884 9 PD 64, PDA

    WILL — English and Spanish wills — Probate of English Will only.
    SIR J. HANNEN (President). I think the application may be granted on proof being given at the registry that the consents have been obtained of all the parties interested. Order accordingly.

  • S Falsely Called B v B

    01 Apr 1884 9 PD 80, PDA

    NULLITY — Decree Nisi — Alimony.
    SIR, J. HANNEN (President). The practice of the Ecclesiastical Court being to allot alimony pendente lite until the decree is pronounced declaring the marriage a nullity, the only question in this case is what difference is made by the statute which substitutes a decree nisi in the first instance for a decree absolute. I think the only effect is to postpone the definite final declaration of nullity until the decree absolute, and that therefore the alimony pendente lite continues until that decree is made.

  • The John Mcintyre

    19 Jul 1881 6 PD 200, PDA

    19 Jun 1884 9 PD 135, CA

    ADMIRALTY — Sailing rules — Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea

  • The Humber

    04 Dec 1883 9 PD 12, DC

    APPEAL — Appeal from court of passage — Leave to appeal

  • The Camellia

    22 Jan 1883 9 PD 27, PDA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    ADMIRALTY — Salvage — Success

  • Lord Salisbury v Nugent

    12 Dec 1883 9 PD 23, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive.
    PROBATE — Undue Influence — Particulars.
    COTTON, L.J. This is an appeal from a decision of the President of the Probate Division declining to order the defendant, who impeaches a will for undue influence, to give particulars of the acts of undue influence alleged and of the times when and the places where each of those acts was alleged to have taken place. The President has ordered the defendant to give the names of the persons charged with undue influence, but declined to go further, and it is admitted that it is not the practice of the Probate Division to go further. If I had to

  • In The Goods of Prince Peter Georgevitch Oldenburg, Deceased

    29 Apr 1884 9 PD 234, PDA

    CROWN — Royal family of russia — Will and Codicils superseded

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies