Results: 51

  • The Kenmure Castle

    17 Feb 1882 7 PD 47, PDA

    ADMIRALTYSalvageAward
  • Brownrigg v Pike

    28 Feb 1882 7 PD 61, PDA

    WILLWill of realtyAppointment of Executor
  • The Vandyck (1881 S 234)

    23 Nov 1881 7 PD 42, PDA

    ADMIRALTYSalvageConstructive Acceptance of Salvage Service
  • Wigney v Wigney

    15 Mar 1882 7 PD 177, CA

    HUSBAND AND WIFEDissolution of marriageVariation of Settlement
  • The Lotus (1881 D No 431 Fo 92)

    26 Apr 1882 7 PD 199, PDA

    ADMIRALTYSalvagePractice
  • In The Goods of Frank Leyland White

    08 Mar 1882 7 PD 65, PDA

    WILLConstruction“Money”
  • Medley v Medley

    06 Jun 1882 7 PD 122, CA

    PRACTICEDivorce CourtAlimony
  • The Cito

    01 Dec 1881 7 PD 5, CA

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    SHIPPINGDerelictRight to Freight after abandonment of Ship.
    BRETT, L.J. I am of opinion that the decision appealed from should be affirmed. Many interesting points have been discussed in this case about which it is not necessary to give any decided opinion. It has been said that such an abandonment of a ship as to make it a derelict together with a subsequent seizure by any one who finds it, makes such seizure the seizure of a droit of the Admiralty, and alters the property in the ship. If that were made out it would strongly support the case for the respondents; but I am not, however, prepared
  • The Mac

    01 Feb 1882 7 PD 38, PDA

    03 Jul 1882 7 PD 126, CA

    Subsequent citations: 4.
    ADMIRALTYSalvageAppeal from Justices
  • Mason v Mason and Mcclune

    18 Jul 1882 7 PD 233, PDA

    HUSBAND AND WIFEDissolution of marriageUnreasonable Delay.
    THE PRESIDENT. The facts of the case raise a novel question, but the objection that has occurred to my mind has not been displaced. The petitioner in 1878 asked for a decree of judicial separation instead of that to which he would have been entitled, viz., a decree for dissolution of his marriage, and now in 1882, having taken no steps in the meantime with a view to induce his wife to break off her connection with the co-respondent, he asks for a decree nisi. He gives as his reason for not having before sought for such decree that he

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies