Skip to Search Facets Skip to Results
Full Search Search Help

Results: 27

  • The Papa De Rossie (W 181)

    09 Jul 1878 3 PD 160, PDA

    COSTS — Taxation of costs — Costs between Solicitor and Client

  • The Andalusian (L 339 Liv)

    30 Jul 1878 3 PD 182, PDA

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    LIMITATION OF LIABILITY — Meaning of Recognised British Ship — Merchant Shipping Act, 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 104), ss. 2, 19, 106, 516

  • The Cleopatra (D 364)

    16 Apr 1878 3 PD 145, PDA

    ADMIRALTY — Salvage — Derelict

  • Combe v Edwards (No 3)

    02 Nov 1878 3 PD 103, Arches Ct

    ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Church Discipline Act (3 & 4 Vict. c. 86) — Disobedience to Monition

  • Bradley v Bradley

    16 Apr 1878 3 PD 47, PDA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    HUSBAND AND WIFE — Sect. 32 of 20 & 21 vict. c. 85 — Order for permanent Maintenance after Decree absolute.
    SIR J. HANNEN (President). This was a suit by a wife against her husband for dissolution of their marriage on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. These charges were established, and a decree nisi was pronounced, which was made absolute on the 20th of November, 1877. On the 3rd of December a petition was filed, praying the Court to exercise the authority given by s. 32 of the 20 & 21 Vict. c. 85, to order the respondent to pay alimony to the petitioner. The language of that section is as follows: “The Court may, if it shall think fit,

  • The Peckforton Castle

    31 Jul 1877 2 PD 222, PDA

    25 Jan 1878 3 PD 11, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COLLISION — Sailing Regulations — Articles 12 and 17

  • The Blessing (G 166)

    05 Feb 1878 3 PD 35, PDA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    WAGES — Jurisdiction — The County Court Admiralty Jurisdiction Act, 1868 (31 & 32 Vict. c. 71), s. 3, sub-s. 2

  • Morris v Freeman and Jane Freeman, His Wife

    25 Jun 1878 3 PD 65, PDA

    COSTS — Married Woman.
    June 25. SIR JAMES HANNEN (President). This was an application to vary an order of this Court by striking out the direction for payment of costs by the female defendant. This action was brought for the purpose of proving the will of one Sarah Morris, deceased. The defendant Jane Freeman, had entered a caveat against the proof of the said will; and upon that caveat being warned, and it appearing that it had been entered by Jane Freeman, she was made defendant in the action. At a subsequent stage of the cause, the registrar ordered that she be at liberty

  • Stanes v Stanes

    11 Dec 1877 3 PD 42, PDA

    HUSBAND AND WIFE — Suit by wife for restitution — Agreement by Petitioner to stay Proceedings on Terms.
    SIR J. HANNEN (President). I have already in the course of the argument expressed my general opinion as to the binding effect of an agreement of this kind upon a suitor in this court. I am of opinion that it makes no difference whether it is in a suit for restitution of conjugal rights or in a suit for judicial separation that the negotiations for a compromise arise, and that in any litigation in this court to which a wife is a party, she is competent to enter into an agreement with reference to that litigation. She is able to

  • In The Goods of Tharp

    27 May 1878 3 PD 76, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PROBATE — Will of Married Woman — Separate Estate

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies