Results: 83

• In The Goods of Hughes

  11 Nov 1873 LR 3 PD 140, PD

  ADMINISTRATION — Widow and Next of Kin — Widow received her share of Estate
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ADMINISTRATION — Widow and Next of Kin — Widow received her share of Estate — 20 & 21 Vict. c. 77, s. 73.

• Brown V Brown and Shelton

  04 Aug 1874 LR 3 PD 202, PD

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Petition for dissolution of marriage — Respondent's Prayer for Judicial Separation
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Petition for dissolution of marriage — Respondent's Prayer for Judicial Separation — Deed of Separation.

• Dancer v Crabb and Thompson

  24 Jun 1873 LR 3 PD 98, PD

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  WILL — Revocation, Total, partial, or contingent — Dependent relative Revocation.
  June 24. SIR JAMES HANNEN. In this case the plaintiff Maria Dancer propounds the will of Maria Thompson deceased, dated the 28th of June, 1865, and alleges that after the execution of the said will the testatrix revoked a portion by tearing off and burning it with the intention of revoking such portion, preserving the remainder, which contained her residuary bequests together with her signature, and the subscription of the attesting witnesses, and claims probate of the portion so preserved. The defendants traverse the due execution of the will, and plead that the deceased revoked the whole of the said
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  WILL — Revocation, Total, partial, or contingent — Dependent relative Revocation.

• In The Goods of Maddock

  05 May 1874 LR 3 PD 169, PD

  WILL — Execution — Witness's Name partly written
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  WILL — Execution — Witness's Name partly written — “Attest and subscribe.”

• Townsend v Townsend (No 1)

  05 Aug 1873 LR 3 PD 129, PD

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Desertion.
  Aug. 5. THE JUDGE ORDINARY. The petitioner was married to the respondent in March, 1864. The respondent was then in a fair way of business as a draper, but he appears soon to have got into difficulties through betting, and he committed several thefts to supply himself with money. His father-in-law, whom he had robbed on one or two occasions, settled some of the charges against him by payment; but at length, in November, 1866, in consequence of a fresh theft, the respondent left his home to avoid arrest. Before leaving he confessed his guilt to the petitioner, and informed
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Desertion.

• In The Goods of Treeby

  25 May 1875 LR 3 PD 242, PD

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  WILL — Alteration — Memorandum at the Foot or End
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  WILL — Alteration — Memorandum at the Foot or End — 1 Vict. c. 26, s. 21.

• Short v Short and Bolwell

  10 Feb 1874 LR 3 PD 193, PD

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Dissolution — Unreasonable Delay
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Dissolution — Unreasonable Delay — Dismissal of Petition.

• Peppercorne v Gardner

  16 Dec 1873 LR 3 PD 149, PD

  ADMINISTRATION — Husband or Wife Survivor — Petition
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ADMINISTRATION — Husband or Wife Survivor — Petition — Practice.

• Boughton and Marston v Knight

  22 Apr 1873 LR 3 PD 64, PD

  Subsequent citations: 7.
  WILL — Testamentary suit — Capacity
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  WILL — Testamentary suit — Capacity — Delusions in Reference to the Conduct of Children — Will pronounced against — Executor's Costs — Practice.

• Morritt v Douglas

  10 Dec 1872 LR 3 PD 1, PD

  WILL — Execution — Mark
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  WILL — Execution — Mark — Acknowledgment.