Results: 43

  • Belisle du Boulay v Jules Réné Herménégilde du Boulay

    11 Mar 1869 LR 2 PC 430, PC

    SAINT LUCIAOld French LawOrdonnances of 1555 and 1803
  • The Bank Of Hindustan, China, and Japan Ltd, In Liquidation v The Eastern Financial Association Ltd, In Liquidation

    15 Mar 1869 LR 2 PC 489, PC

    COMPANYJoint stock companyIndian Act, No. XIX. of 1857
  • Evanturel v Evanturel

    04 Mar 1869 LR 2 PC 462, PC

    WILLLower canadaExecution of Will
  • The Owners Of The Brig Alice v The Owners Of The Brig Rosita

    28 Nov 1868 LR 2 PC 214, PC

    COLLISIONRule of pleading “secundum allegata et probata,” when not binding.
    LORD CHELMSFORD:— Their Lordships have been placed in some little difficulty in this case, and they desire to hear one Counsel on each side in the Rosita suit, upon the ground, that the cause of injury is not properly alleged in the pleadings. There have been recent decisions in which their Lordships have held it necessary that a party seeking redress for an injury can only recover “secundum allegata et probata.” In a case in which the circumstances proved did not establish the allegations in the pleadings, although upon the true state of facts the Plaintiff would have been entitled
  • In Re Mcinnes’ Patent

    24 Feb 1868 LR 2 PC 54, PC

    PATENTLetters patentSpecification
  • In Re Mcdougal’s Patent

    05 Dec 1867 LR 2 PC 1, PC

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PATENTLetters patentSubject matter known chemical substances in combination, in common use before and after grant
  • Alexander Rodger, Charles Carnie, and Richard James Gilman v The Comptoir D’Escompte De Paris, and The Chartered Bank Of India, Australia, and China

    05 Feb 1869 LR 2 PC 393, PC

    VENDOR AND PURCHASERStoppage in transituBills of lading
  • Jean Baptiste Renaud v Joseph Guillet, Dit Tourangeau

    13 Dec 1867 LR 2 PC 4, PC

    WILLLower canada, law ofWill
  • Reid, v The Aberdeen, Newcastle, and Hull Steam Co

    30 Nov 1868 LR 2 PC 245, PC

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    APPEALAppeal involving question of fact onlyPractice
  • The Rev Lewis Rugg v William Howley Kingsmill

    17 Dec 1867 LR 2 PC 59, PC

    ECCLESIASTICAL LAWFaculty for vaultDiscretion of Ordinary in granting

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies