Results: 103

  • Rekstin v Severo Sibirsko Gosudarstvennoe Akcionernoe Obschestvo Komseverputj and the Bank for Russian Trade Ltd

    24 Jun 1932 [1933] 1 KB 47, CA

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 10.
    BANKINGBanker and CustomerGarnishee Proceedings
  • Cammell Laird and Co Ltd v Manganese Bronze and Brass Co Ltd

    01 Mar 1933 [1933] 2 KB 141, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    SALE OF GOODSContract to manufacture Propeller for a particular ShipPlans and Dimensions supplied by Purchaser
  • The King v Sussex Justices

    31 May 1933 [1933] 2 KB 707, DC

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    LICENSINGHours of OpeningExemption
  • Vanbergen v St Edmunds Properties Ltd

    14 Mar 1933 [1933] 2 KB 223, CA

    Subsequent citations: 3.
    CONTRACTConsiderationDebt
  • The King v Assessment Committee For Northeastern Assessment Area Of Surrey

    16 Dec 1932 [1933] 1 KB 776, DC

    RATINGBoroughValuation List
  • Freshwater v Western Australian Assurance Co Ltd

    22 Nov 1932 [1933] 1 KB 515, CA

    Subsequent citations: 5.
    INSURANCEThird Party RisksMotor Accident
  • St James’ and Pall Mall Electric Light Co Ltd v City Of Westminster Assessment Committee

    19 Dec 1932 [1933] 1 KB 605, CA

    RATINGRates and ratingElectricity Supply Undertaking
  • Maloney v St Helens Industrial Co-Operative Society Ltd

    03 Nov 1932 [1933] 1 KB 293, CA

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    MASTER AND SERVANTWages payable to Servant “during periods of sickness”Whether “sickness” includes Disablement by Accident.
    SCRUTTON L.J. It seems to me that if the Workmen's Compensation Act is left out of consideration the point involved is quite a short one. The question arises out of an award with regard to wages payable to a workman who is disabled from carrying out his duties. If he is disabled, what is to be done as to his wages? The independent chairman of the National Conciliation Board for the co-operative service has made an award in which he has laid down what is to happen with regard to the wages of a workman during sickness; and this he
  • In Re County Borough Of Gateshead (Barn Close) Clearance Order, 1931

    02 Dec 1932 [1933] 1 KB 429, KBD

    HOUSINGClearance orderBusiness Premises
  • Oliver v Birmingham and Midland Motor Omnibus Co Ltd

    10 Jun 1932 [1933] 1 KB 35, DC

    NEGLIGENCEContributory negligenceInjury to Infant

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies