Results: 43

• Evenden v Guildford City Association Football Club Ltd

  23 Jul 1974 [1974] ICR 554, NIRC

  25 Apr 1975 [1975] QB 917; [1975] 3 WLR 251; [1975] ICR 367; [1975] 3 All ER 269, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 3 negative. Subsequent citations: 19.
  EMPLOYMENT — Redundancy — Continuous employment

  ESTOPPEL — Conduct, by — Equitable
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  EMPLOYMENT — Redundancy — Continuous employment — Employee changing employer after 13 years — Assurances from new employer that continuity of employment preserved — Dismissal for redundancy — Whether employers estopped from denying continuity — Whether presumption of continuity applicable — Redundancy Payments Act 1965, s 9 (2)

  ESTOPPEL — Conduct, by — Equitable — Promissory — Employee changing employer — Assurance from new employer that continuity of employment preserved — Whether promissory estoppel

  1 Case considered

  2 Statutes considered
• Flint v Eastern Electricity Board

  20 May 1975 [1975] ICR 395, QBD

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 3 neutral. Subsequent citations: 15.
  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Industrial tribunals — Review of decision
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Industrial tribunals — Review of decision — Dismissal by tribunal of employee's application for redundancy — Employee's application for review of decision on ground of evidence not adduced at hearing — Evidence within knowledge of employee at hearing — Whether jurisdiction — Industrial Tribunals (Industrial Relations, etc) Regulations 1972, Sch, r 12 (1) (d) (e)

  4 Case(s) considered

  1 Statutory Instrument considered

• Sturges v A E Farr Ltd

  09 Jun 1975 [1975] ICR 356, QBD

  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Unfair dismissal — Complaint
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Unfair dismissal — Complaint — Time limit — Complaint dated five days before time limit expired — Complaint received by tribunal after time limit had expired — Delay in postal service — Whether “practicable” for complaint to be presented within period — Industrial Tribunals (Industrial Relations, etc) Regulations 1972, Sch, r 2 (1) (a)

  1 Case considered

• Trotman v British Railways Board

  28 Oct 1974 [1975] ICR 95; 1 KILR 161, QBD

  RAILWAY — Negligence — Duty of care
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  RAILWAY — Negligence — Duty of care — Employers' rules for safety of employees working on railway line — Non-compliance with rules — Employee killed by train — Whether employers liable

• In re Cadbury Schweppes Ltd and J Lyons & Co Ltd’s Agreement

  21 Feb 1975 [1975] 1 WLR 1018; [1975] ICR 240; [1975] 2 All ER 307, RPCt

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES — Registration — Agreements registrable
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES — Registration — Agreements registrable — Agreement by company producing citrus concentrate to order part of its requirements from another company — Agreement replacing prior registrable restrictive agreement — Effect of circumstances surrounding formation, and purpose, of agreement — Whether agreement containing express or implied restrictions on production — Whether agreement registrable — Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1956, ss 6 (1) (3) (4), 7 (2), 8 (3)

  2 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered

• Port Talbot Engineering Co Ltd v Passmore

  26 Mar 1975 [1975] ICR 234, QBD

  Subsequent citations: 8.
  EMPLOYMENT — Redundancy — Continuous employment
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  EMPLOYMENT — Redundancy — Continuous employment — Company yearly contracting with independent contractors to maintain company's plant — Yearly contracts held by successive contractors but employees retained by contractors for maintenance work — Employees dismissed for redundancy — Whether employees continuously employed — Redundancy Payments Act 1965, s 13 (1) — Contracts of Employment Act 1972, Sch 1, para 9 (2)

  2 Case(s) considered

  2 Statutes considered

• Rowbotham v Arthur Lee & Sons Ltd

  21 Nov 1974 [1975] ICR 109, QBD

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  EMPLOYMENT — Redundancy — Dismissal
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  EMPLOYMENT — Redundancy — Dismissal — Place of work — Employers offering identical employment at another factory in same town — Whether employees required to work under contracts of employment at both works — Employees' difficulty in travelling to work — Whether refusal of alternative employment unreasonable — Redundancy Payments Act 1965, ss 1 (2), 2 (3) (4)

  1 Case considered

  1 Statute considered

• Millington v T H Goodwin & Sons Ltd

  13 Nov 1974 [1975] ICR 104, QBD

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Unfair dismissal — Compensation
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Unfair dismissal — Compensation — Employee's dismissal both unfair and on ground of redundancy — Whether compensation for unfair dismissal to include loss of redundancy rights — Tribunal's failure to state how compensation assessed and to give reasons for finding that employee's conduct contributed to his dismissal — Industrial Relations Act 1971, s 116 (3)

  3 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered

• Barnes v BPC (Business Forms) Ltd

  22 May 1975 [1975] 1 WLR 1565; [1975] ICR 390; [1976] 1 All ER 237, QBD

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  EVIDENCE — Witness — Order of

  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Industrial tribunals — Procedure
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  EVIDENCE — Witness — Order of — Rights of counsel and solicitors — Choice of order in which to call witnesses

  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Industrial tribunals — Procedure — Four-day hearing spread over prolonged period — Chairman of tribunal requesting employees' solicitor to interpose witnesses — Solicitor unwilling to call witnesses at that stage — Solicitor's right to choose order witnesses called — Whether employees prejudiced — Whether hearing fair and just

  1 Case considered

• Malins v Post Office

  25 Jul 1974 [1975] ICR 60, QBD

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  CROWN — Servant — Dismissal
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CROWN — Servant — Dismissal — Plaintiff appointed sub-postmaster — Crown's right to dismiss at pleasure — Duties of Postmaster General transferred to public authority — Whether public authority right to terminate agreement — Post Office Act 1969, s 6 (5), Sch 9, para 2 (1) (b)

  2 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered