Results: 3

• Clayton v Clayton

  27 Jun 2006 [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2006] Fam 83; [2006] 3 WLR 599; [2007] 1 All ER 1197; [2007] 1 FLR 11, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 68.
  CHILDREN — Family proceedings — Restriction on publication
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Family proceedings — Restriction on publication — Whether prohibition on identifying child continuing after conclusion of proceedings — Whether prohibition infringing Convention rights — Administration of Justice Act 1960, s 12 (as amended by Children Act 1989, s 108(5), Sch 13, para 14) — Children Act 1989, s 97(2) (as amended by Access to Justice Act 1999, s 72 and Children Act 2004, s 62(1)) — Human Rights Act 1998, s 3, Sch 1, Pt I, arts 8, 10

  3 Case(s) considered

  3 Statutes considered
• In re Bentley Emmanuel Church, Bentley

  29 Nov 2005 [2006] Fam 39; [2006] 2 WLR 1068, Arches Ct

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 8.
  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Telecommunications installation

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Practice — Appeal

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Practice — Petition
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Telecommunications installation — Mobile telephone aerials on tower of unlisted church — Whether appropriate secular use of church — Whether petitioners required to show necessity or merely good reason — Whether court required to have due regard to role of church as local centre of worship and mission — Relevance of government planning guidance regarding health risks associated with telecommunications installations — Whether weight to be given to unsubstantiated subjective perception of hazard in local community — Whether faculty to be granted — Care of Churches and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1991, s 1

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Practice — Appeal — Requirement to deliver “court file” to provincial registrar — Whether encompassing totality of documentation relating to petition — Manner in which file to be kept — Faculty Jurisdiction (Appeals) Rules 1998, r 7(7)(b)

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Practice — Petition — Public notice of petition — Contents — When to be displayed — Determination on written representations — Procedure for deciding whether case suitable — Faculty Jurisdiction Rules 2000, rr 3, 4, 6, 26(1)

  2 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  1 Statute considered

  2 Statutory Instruments considered
• In re Welford Road Cemetery, Leicester

  23 Jan 2006 [2006] Fam 62; [2006] 2 WLR 1214, Const Ct

  13 Oct 2006 [2007] Fam 15; [2007] 2 WLR 506; [2007] 1 All ER 426, Arches Ct

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 5.
  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Municipal cemetery
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Municipal cemetery — Burial authority carrying out cemetery safety inspection — Memorials found to be unsafe laid flat — Burial authority seeking confirmatory faculty and faculty authorising future health and safety works — Whether memorial remaining property of person erecting it — Where responsibility for maintenance lying — Test to be applied on petition for confirmatory faculty — Whether laying memorials flat appropriate or proportionate response to risk — Whether jurisdiction to make restoration order requiring repair and restabilisation of memorials — Whether confirmatory faculty to be granted — Whether to be conditional on restoration of memorials — Whether conditional faculty for future works to be granted — Care of Churches and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Measure 1991 (No 1), ss 12(1), 13(5)

  9 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered