Results: 8

• Customs and Excise Comrs v A

  22 Jul 2002 [2002] EWCA Civ 1039; [2003] Fam 55; [2003] 2 WLR 210; [2003] 2 All ER 736, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral; 2 negative. Subsequent citations: 44.
  CRIME — Drugs — Confiscation order

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Transfer of property

  PRACTICE — Judgment — Length of judgment
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CRIME — Drugs — Confiscation order — Defendant's wife applying for transfer of matrimonial home in ancillary relief proceedings — Confiscation order made against defendant — Receiver appointed over defendant's property — Whether receiver to be directed to realise defendant's interest in house — Whether confiscation order proceedings having precedence over ancillary relief proceedings — Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 24 — Drug Trafficking Act 1994, s 31

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Transfer of property — Wife applying for transfer of matrimonial home — Confiscation order made against husband in criminal proceedings — Receiver appointed over husband's property — Whether house to be transferred to wife — Whether confiscation order proceedings having precedence over ancillary relief proceedings — Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, ss 24, 25 (as substituted by Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, s 3) — Drug Trafficking Act 1994, s 31

  PRACTICE — Judgment — Length of judgment — Guidance to judges

  4 Case(s) considered

• Lambert v Lambert

  14 Nov 2002 [2002] EWCA Civ 1685; [2003] Fam 103; [2003] 2 WLR 631; [2003] 4 All ER 342; [2003] 1 FLR 139, CA

  25 Mar 2003 (pet dis) [2003] 1 WLR 926, HL(E)

  Subsequent citations: 16.
  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Lump sum award
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Lump sum award — Means of parties — Large family assets built up over long period of marriage — Husband running business while wife looking after home — Whether husband's contribution to marriage special — Whether equal division of assets appropriate — Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 (as substituted by Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, s 3)

  3 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered
• In re R (A Child) (IVF: Paternity of Child)

  19 Feb 2003 [2003] EWCA Civ 182; [2003] Fam 129; [2003] 2 WLR 1485; [2003] 2 All ER 131; [2003] 1 FLR 1183, CA

  29 Mar 2004 (pet all) [2005] UKHL 33; [2005] 2 AC 621; [2004] 1 WLR 1034; [2005] 2 WLR 1158; [2005] 4 All ER 433; [2005] 2 FLR 843, HL(E)

  Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; most recently considered: 2020. Subsequent citations: 23.
  MEDICAL PRACTITIONER — Medical treatment — Human fertilisation
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  MEDICAL PRACTITIONER — Medical treatment — Human fertilisation — Woman and man seeking IVF treatment as couple — Fertilisation of eggs in vitro by use of donor sperm — Pregnancy resulting from implantation subsequent to separation — Whether receiving “treatment … together” — Whether man legal father of child — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, s 28(3)

  2 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  1 Statute considered
• S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order)

  04 Mar 2002 [2002] EWHC 223 (Fam); [2003] Fam 1; [2002] 3 WLR 1372; [2002] 1 FLR 992, Fam D (Bracewell J)

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 29.
  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Agreement
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Agreement — Order of court — Consent order settling ancillary relief proceedings — Subsequent House of Lords ruling changing law on division of assets between spouses — Wife applying to set aside consent order — Whether House of Lords ruling supervening event — Whether invalidating consent order

  4 Case(s) considered

• L v L (Financial Provision: Contributions)

  14 Nov 2002 [2003] Fam 103; [2003] 2 WLR 631; [2002] 1 FLR 642, CA

  Subsequent citations: 11.
  THORPE LJ Introduction This is an appeal from the judgment of Connell J dated 22 October 2001. He conducted the trial of the ancillary relief proceedings brought by Shan Lambert against her husband Harry Lambert for eight days between 2 and 10 October. The judgment that he gave some 12 days later was reserved and handed down. Permission to appeal was given by me on paper on 5 December 2001, the application having been lodged with this court on 16 November following refusal by Connell J on 31 October. An interval of ten months between grant of permission and listing
  Expand

  1 Case considered

• Simms v Simms (A v A (A Child))

  17 Dec 2002 [2002] EWHC 2734 (Fam); [2003] Fam 83; [2003] 2 WLR 1465; [2003] 1 All ER 669, Fam D

  Subsequent citations: 7.
  MEDICAL PRACTITIONER — Medical treatment, consent to — Experimental treatment
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  MEDICAL PRACTITIONER — Medical treatment, consent to — Experimental treatment — Patient lacking capacity to consent due to incurable neurodegenerative disease — Proposed treatment experimental and untested on humans — Application for declaration that lawful to administer such treatment — Whether in patient's best interests

  1 Case considered

• In re M (A Child) (Children and Family Reporter: Disclosure)

  31 Jul 2002 [2002] EWCA Civ 1199; [2003] Fam 26; [2002] 3 WLR 1669; [2002] 4 All ER 401; [2002] 2 FLR 893, CA

  Subsequent citations: 7.
  CHILDREN — Family proceedings court — Children and family reporter
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Family proceedings court — Children and family reporter — Whether free to report concerns about child abuse to social services without permission of judge — Administration of Justice Act 1960 (as amended by Children Act 1989, s 108(5), Sch 13, para 14), s 12 — Children Act 1989 (as amended by Access to Justice Act 1999, s 72 and Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000, s 74, Sch 7, para 88), ss 7, 97(2) — Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000, s 12 — Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (as amended by Family Proceedings (Amendment) Rules 2001, rr 16(a)(b), 19, 24(a)), rr 4.11, 4.23

  2 Case(s) considered

  3 Statutes considered

  1 Statutory Instrument considered
• In re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Diplomatic Immunity)

  30 Jul 2002 [2002] EWHC 1751 (Fam); [2003] Fam 16; [2003] 2 WLR 168; [2003] 1 FLR 241, Fam D

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 9.
  CHILDREN — Care proceedings — Jurisdiction
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Care proceedings — Jurisdiction — Child of member of administrative and technical staff of foreign embassy — Whether diplomatic privilege barring public law proceedings in respect of child — Whether jurisdiction to make interim care order — Diplomatic Privileges Act 1964, Sch 1, arts 30(1), 37(2)

  2 Case(s) considered

  1 Statute considered