Results: 7

• In re T (Minors) (Adopted Children: Contact)

  28 Jul 1995 [1996] Fam 34; [1995] 3 WLR 793; [1996] 1 All ER 215; [1995] 2 FLR 792, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 5.
  CHILDREN — Orders with respect to children — Contact order
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Orders with respect to children — Contact order — Contact with half-sister following adoption — Adoptive parents informally agreeing to provide annual reports — Adoptive parents subsequently refusing to provide report — Whether half-sister to be granted leave to apply for contact order — Children Act 1989, s 10(9)

  1 Case considered

  1 Statute considered

• In re C (Minors) (Contact: Jurisdiction)

  20 Sep 1994 [1996] Fam 79; [1995] 3 WLR 30; [1995] 1 FLR 777, CA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  CHILDREN — Orders with respect to children — Contact order
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Orders with respect to children — Contact order — Frequency of contact — Contact with parents pending adoption — Judge reducing frequency originally ordered — No ambiguity or slip in original order — Whether jurisdiction to vary — Whether “family proceedings” concluded when original order made — Children Act 1989, ss 8(2)(3), 9(2), 10(1)

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  1 Statute considered
• In re S (Hospital Patient: Court’s Jurisdiction)

  26 Sep 1994 [1995] Fam 26; [1995] 2 WLR 38; [1995] 1 All ER 449; [1995] 1 FLR 302, Fam D

  02 Mar 1995 [1996] Fam 1; [1995] 3 WLR 78; [1995] 3 All ER 290; [1995] 1 FLR 1075, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 52.
  HIGH COURT — Jurisdiction — Declaratory relief
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HIGH COURT — Jurisdiction — Declaratory relief — Norwegian citizen residing with plaintiff in England — Incapacitated by stroke and living in private hospital — Family decision to remove to Norway — Plaintiff seeking declaration that removal unlawful and injunction to restrain removal — Whether jurisdiction to grant declaration — Whether plaintiff having locus standi — Whether interlocutory injunction to be granted pending trial

  7 Case(s) considered
• In re St Mary the Virgin, Sherborne

  17 May 1996 [1996] Fam 63; [1996] 3 WLR 434; [1996] 3 All ER 769, Arches Ct

  Subsequent considerations : 2 positive. Subsequent citations: 15.
  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Consistory court — Appeal from

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Listed building
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Consistory court — Appeal from — Form of notice of appeal — Admission of additional oral evidence on appeal — Court fees normally to be paid by petitioner — Incidence of parties' own costs in consistory court and on appeal

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Listed building — Replacement of west window — Whether proposed change necessary — Whether adversely affecting character of church — Whether chancellor properly exercising discretion in granting faculty
• Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council v L

  07 Mar 1996 [1996] Fam 55; [1996] 3 WLR 426; [1996] 3 All ER 264; [1996] 2 FLR 179, Fam D (Wilson J)

  Subsequent considerations : 3 neutral. Subsequent citations: 11.
  CHILDREN — Care proceedings — Designated local authority
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CHILDREN — Care proceedings — Designated local authority — Child in interim care — Mother moving from one local authority area to another — Child remaining in secure accommodation elsewhere — Whether child ordinarily resident in area of any authority — Determination of designated local authority — Children Act 1989, s 31(8)

  1 Case considered

  1 Statute considered
• In re St Michael and All Angels, Tettenhall Regis

  28 Apr 1995 [1995] Fam 179; [1995] 3 WLR 299; [1996] 1 All ER 231, Const Ct

  26 Oct 1995 [1996] Fam 44; [1996] 2 WLR 385; [1996] 1 All ER 231, Arches Ct

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 5.
  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Burial ground

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Extension to church
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Burial ground — Burial ground closed and further burials forbidden — Disinterment of human remains in course of building works — Whether to be reinterred elsewhere in burial ground — Resiting of gravestones without consent of owners — Whether works “for the purpose of enlarging the church” — Burial Act 1853, s 3 — Disused Burial Grounds Act 1884, s 3

  ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Faculty — Extension to church — Proposal to build meeting room on disused burial ground — Extension likely to create extensive and wholesale disruption of human remains — Whether faculty to be granted

  8 Case(s) considered

  1 Words & Phrases considered

  2 Statutes considered

• In re S (Hospital Patient: Foreign Curator)

  11 Jul 1995 [1996] Fam 23; [1995] 3 WLR 596; [1995] 4 All ER 30; [1996] 1 FLR 167, Fam D

  Subsequent citations: 7.
  HIGH COURT — Jurisdiction — Declaratory relief
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  HIGH COURT — Jurisdiction — Declaratory relief — Patient in private hospital in England — Norwegian citizen physically and mentally incapacitated by stroke — Norwegian court appointing guardian — Whether appointment to be recognised by English court — Whether proposals of foreign guardian for future care of patient to be considered — Whether best interests of patient requiring future care in Norway or in England