Results: 41

• Metropolitan Bank v Heiron

  05 Aug 1880 5 Ex D 319; 5 ExD 319, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 neutral; 2 negative. Subsequent citations: 11.
  LIMITATION OF ACTION — Statute of limitations — Breach of Duty by Person in a Fiduciary Position
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  LIMITATION OF ACTION — Statute of limitations — Breach of Duty by Person in a Fiduciary Position — Bribe to Director — Concealed Fraud.

• Webb v East

  12 Dec 1879 5 ExD 23, DC

  21 Jan 1880 5 ExD 108, CA

  Subsequent citations: 2.
  PRACTICE — Production of documents — Privileged Communications
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PRACTICE — Production of documents — Privileged Communications — Tendency to Criminate.

• Ashdown v Ingamells

  05 Jun 1880 5 ExD 280, CA

  DAMAGES — Damages, measure of — Agreement to sell Property in Consideration of Payment of Debts
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  DAMAGES — Damages, measure of — Agreement to sell Property in Consideration of Payment of Debts — Insolvency of Vendors — Action by Trustee for Breach of Contract — Nominal Damages.

• Stevens v Sampson

  15 Nov 1879 5 ExD 53, CA

  Subsequent citations: 1.
  LIBEL — Privileged Communication — Report of Proceedings before a Court of Justice.
  LORD COLERIDGE, C.J. The question before us is whether, on the findings of the jury, the entry of the judgment for the plaintiff is right. I am of opinion that it was rightly entered for the plaintiff. The principle which governs this case is plain. It is like that which governs most other cases of privilege. In order, in cases of libel, to establish that the communication is privileged, two elements must exist; not only must the occasion create the privilege, but the occasion must be made use of bonâ fide and without malice; if either of these is absent,
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  LIBEL — Privileged Communication — Report of Proceedings before a Court of Justice.

• Fletcher v Hudson

  17 Jun 1880 5 ExD 287, CA

  LOCAL GOVERNMENT — Local board — Acting as Member after Disqualification
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  LOCAL GOVERNMENT — Local board — Acting as Member after Disqualification — Action for Penalty — Party aggrieved — Public Health Act, 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 55), s. 253, sch. 2, rule 70.

  1 Statute considered

• Ashenden v The London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Co

  09 Mar 1880 5 ExD 190, DC

  RAILWAY — Railway company — Railway and Canal Traffic Act, 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 31), s. 7
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  RAILWAY — Railway company — Railway and Canal Traffic Act, 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 31), s. 7 — Notice — Limiting Liability — Reasonable Conditions.

  1 Statute considered

• Boldero v The London and Westminster Loan and Discount Co Ltd

  17 Nov 1879 5 ExD 47, DC

  FRAUD — Fraudulent conveyance — 13 Eliz. c. 5
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  FRAUD — Fraudulent conveyance — 13 Eliz. c. 5 — Delaying Creditors.

• Potter v Cotton

  03 Dec 1879 5 ExD 137, CA

  PRACTICE — Appeal — Trial by Judge without a Jury
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PRACTICE — Appeal — Trial by Judge without a Jury — Motion for New Trial.
• Leigh v Jack

  11 Dec 1879 5 Ex D 264; 5 ExD 264, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 4 positive; 1 neutral; 2 negative. Subsequent citations: 16.
  VENDOR AND PURCHASER — Conveyance of Land adjoining intended Highway — Presumption as to Ownership of Soil of intended Highway
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  VENDOR AND PURCHASER — Conveyance of Land adjoining intended Highway — Presumption as to Ownership of Soil of intended Highway — Statute of Limitations (3 & 4 Wm. 4, c. 27), ss. 2, 3 — Dispossession of Owner of Land — Discontinuance of Possession — User of Land.

  1 Statute considered

• The Alina

  5 ExD 227, CA

  25 Feb 1880 (Note) 5 PD 138, CA

  Subsequent citations: 6.
  ADMIRALTY — Admiralty jurisdiction of county courts — Breach of Charterparty
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  ADMIRALTY — Admiralty jurisdiction of county courts — Breach of Charterparty — County Courts Admiralty Jurisdiction Act, 1868 (31 & 32 Vict. c. 71), s. 3 — County Courts Admiralty Jurisdiction Amendment Act, 1869 (32 & 33 Vict. c. 51), s. 2.

  3 Case(s) considered