Results: 47

  • Lords Bailiff-Jurats Of Romney Marsh v Corpn Of The Trinity House

    11 May 1870 LR 5 Exch 204, Ex Ct

    11 May 1872 LR 7 Exch 247, Ex Ct

    NEGLIGENCEProximate CauseNatural Forces.
    BLACKBURN, J. We are all of opinion that the judgment of the Court of Exchequer should be affirmed. The damage caused is stated to have been the inevitable consequence of the ship striking the bank through the defendants' negligence. That being so, they are clearly liable. KEATING, MELLOR, LUSH, BRETT, and GROVE, JJ., concurred.
  • McManus v Bark

    18 Jan 1870 LR 5 Exch 65, Ex Ct

    PROMISSORY NOTESubsequent AgreementVariation in Mode of Payment
  • Wright v Hitchcock

    11 Jan 1870 LR 5 Exch 37, Ex Ct

    PATENTInfringement by Buying and SellingConstruction of Patent
  • Duke Of Northumberland v Houghton

    26 Jan 1870 LR 5 Exch 127, Ex Ct

    FISHERYRoyal FranchisePrerogative
  • Cranwell v Mayor, Commonality and Citizens of London

    24 Jun 1870 LR 5 Exch 284, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COMPENSATIONCompensation for lands compulsorily takenNotice requiring Possession
  • Kreuger v Blanck

    10 May 1870 LR 5 Exch 179, Ex Ct

    CONTRACTContract of saleConstruction
  • Peirce v Jersey Waterworks Co Ltd

    10 May 1870 LR 5 Exch 209, Ex Ct

    COMPANYPower to commence businessWhole Capital to be subscribed for.
    MARTIN, B. In my judgment this rule should be discharged, on the ground that, looking at the terms of the articles of association, until 3000 shares were subscribed for there existed no such incorporated company as the plaintiff could contract with. That is, I think, the true construction of the second clause; until the happening of that event, although the directors might contract in their own names, they could not contract as directors of the company, and so as to bind them. If there be anything in the Act of 25 & 26 Vict. c. 89, contrary to such a
  • Castle v Playford

    04 May 1870 LR 5 Exch 165, Ex Ct

    VENDOR AND PURCHASERCondition PrecedentReceipt of Bills of Lading
  • The Queen v Eaves

    21 Jan 1870 LR 5 Exch 75, Ex Ct

    PRACTICEExcise prosecutionNotice of Appeal
  • Prehn v Royal Bank Of Liverpool

    31 Jan 1870 LR 5 Exch 92, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    BANKINGLetter of creditBill of Exchange

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies