Results: 53

  • Mercantile Bank v Gladstone

    01 Jun 1868 LR 3 Exch 233, Ex Ct

    SHIPPINGShip and shippingTransfer of Ship on Voyage
  • Lord Foley v Inland Revenue Comrs

    08 Jun 1868 LR 3 Exch 263, Ex Ct

    STAMP DUTYStampMortgage
  • Wilson v Ford

    23 Jan 1868 LR 3 Exch 63, Ex Ct

    HUSBAND AND WIFEDesertionWhat are “Necessaries” for the Wife
  • Scott v Stansfield

    03 Jun 1868 LR 3 Exch 220, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    DEFAMATIONSlanderCounty Court Judge
  • Earl Of Derby v Bury Improvement Comrs

    28 Feb 1868 LR 3 Exch 121, Ex Ct

    14 May 1869 LR 4 Exch 222, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 2.
    NUISANCESewersConstruction
  • Pearson v Glazebrook

    23 Nov 1867 LR 3 Exch 27, Ex Ct

    COUNTY COURTJurisdictionTitle
  • Mudge v Rowan

    28 Jan 1868 LR 3 Exch 85, Ex Ct

    BANKRUPTCYHusband and WifeSeparation Deed
  • Smith v Mercer

    20 Nov 1867 LR 3 Exch 51, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    SALE OF GOODSPayment by “approved” BillVendor's Right to have recourse to Purchaser on dishonour of Bill
  • Perryman v Lister

    14 May 1868 LR 3 Exch 197, Ex Ct

    FALSE IMPRISONMENTReasonable and Probable CauseHearsay Evidence.
    PIGOTT, B. [after stating the facts of the case, proceeded]:— The view taken by the Lord Chief Baron at the trial was, that the defendant was bound to have inquired of Robinson, and to have learned from him whether he had seen the rifle in the plaintiff's possession, before he was justified in causing the arrest, and he so directed the jury, who thereupon found a verdict for the plaintiff. With all respect, I cannot think this view was correct. It may be taken that although a probable cause did exist, yet that is not enough unless the facts which
  • Mcfadzen v Mayor and Corpn Of Liverpool

    09 Jun 1868 LR 3 Exch 279, Ex Ct

    PRACTICEInterrogatoriesCriminating Question

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies