Results: 63

  • Blackmore v Yates

    17 Apr 1867 LR 2 Exch 225, Ex Ct

    RAILWAYRailway companyAssignment of Rolling Stock
  • Chadwick v Marsden

    04 Jun 1867 LR 2 Exch 285, Ex Ct

    LEASEConstructionPreservation of passage for “water and soil.”
    June 4. The judgment of the Court (Bramwell and Channell, BB.) was delivered by BRAMWELL, B. We think this rule should be discharged. The plaintiffs' case on the declaration and in proof was that the defendant sent certain waste and refuse from tan-pits down a watercourse, the outlet of which was a pipe through the plaintiffs' land; that the pipe was stopped, the water accumulated, and damaged the plaintiffs. The defendant admitted this, but said he had a right to send the water and refuse down; and that, if the pipe was stopped, the plaintiffs, if they wished to avoid
  • Warburton v Great Western Railway Co

    17 Nov 1866 LR 2 Exch 30, Ex Ct

    NEGLIGENCEMaster and servantFellow Servant
  • Forster v Mackreth

    12 Feb 1867 LR 2 Exch 163, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    ATTORNEYPartnershipPower to draw Cheques
  • Colchester v Kewney

    26 Jun 1866 LR 1 Exch 368, Ex Ct

    18 May 1867 LR 2 Exch 253, Ex Ct

    REVENUELand TaxExemption
  • Nuttall v Bracewell

    03 Nov 1866 LR 2 Exch 1, Ex Ct

    EASEMENTWatercourseRiparian Owner
  • Anthony v The Brecon Markets Co

    24 Jan 1867 LR 2 Exch 167, Ex Ct

    Subsequent considerations : 2 negative.
    CONSTRUCTIONSlaughter HouseTowns Improvement Clauses Act, 1847 (10 & 11 Vict. c. 34), s. 126.
    Jan. 24. The judgment of the Court (Kelly, C.B., Channell, and Pigott, BB.) was delivered by KELLY, C.B. The question in this case is, whether the plaintiff, who holds certain premises used as a slaughter house under the Brecon Markets Company, the defendants, with a warranty of title, can use these premises as a slaughter house, without the licence of the local board of health, under the Towns Improvement Clauses Act, 1847. If a licence be necessary, the defendants have failed to make a good title to the premises, and the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict. It is enacted
  • Walker v The Great Western Railway Co

    18 Apr 1867 LR 2 Exch 228, Ex Ct

    RAILWAYRailway companyGeneral Manager
  • Maber v Maber, Executrix

    09 Feb 1867 LR 2 Exch 153, Ex Ct

    LIMITATION OF ACTIONStatute of limitations (21 jac. 1, c. 16), s. 3Acknowledgment
  • Wilson v Jones

    07 Feb 1866 LR 1 Exch 193, Ex Ct

    08 Feb 1867 LR 2 Exch 139, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 5.
    INSURANCEPolicy of insurancePolicy on Adventure

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies