Results: 42

  • Hemming v Batchelor

    29 Jan 1875 LR 10 Exch 54, Ex Ct

    PRACTICEDeath of Plaintiff after NonsuitAbatement of Action
  • Castro v Murray

    08 May 1875 LR 10 Exch 213, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PRACTICEPetty Bag OfficeSealing Writ of Error in Misdemeanor
  • Rees v Williams

    27 Apr 1875 LR 10 Exch 200, Ex Ct

    ATTORNEYAttorney and solicitorRemuneration in Lieu of Costs
  • Mill v Hawker and Wickett

    04 Jun 1874 LR 9 Exch 309, Ex Ct

    11 Feb 1875 LR 10 Exch 92, Ex Ct

    TRESPASSHighway BoardIndividual Corporators
  • Tyers v The Rosedale and Ferryhill Iron Co Ltd

    06 May 1873 LR 8 Exch 305, Ex Ct

    15 May 1875 LR 10 Exch 195, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    CONTRACTContract of sale of goodsDelivery by Instalments
  • Armstrong v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Co

    23 Jan 1875 LR 10 Exch 47, Ex Ct

    NEGLIGENCECollision between Railway CarriagesIdentification of Passenger with his Driver
  • Ellis v Wilmot

    12 Nov 1874 LR 10 Exch 10, Ex Ct

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    SURETYPrincipal and suretyLiquidation by Arrangement
  • Warner v The Brighton Aquarium Co

    11 Jun 1875 LR 10 Exch 291, Ex Ct

    SUNDAYProfanation of the lord's-day or sunday21 Geo. 3, c. 49, s. 1
  • Dalbiac v Delacourt

    07 May 1875 LR 10 Exch 210, Ex Ct

    PRACTICEEjectmentCosts on Judgment for Plaintiff by Consent.
    BRAMWELL, B. The rule must be absolute. The validity of the order is not in dispute. The general notion entertained has been that costs follow upon a judgment for the plaintiff in ejectment. If we were to discover that costs did not follow in the old action before the Common Law Procedure Act, there might be some difficulty in seeing how they could follow since the Act, but it is manifest from the books that where the judgment was against the real defendant costs followed; the judgment was in form for damages and costs, though a “remittitur damna” was usually
  • Gunnestad v Price (Fullmore v Wait)

    12 Feb 1875 LR 10 Exch 65, Ex Ct

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 2.
    COUNTY COURTAdmiralty JurisdictionDemurrage

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies