Skip to Search Facets Skip to Results
Full Search Search Help

Results: 126

  • Young v Young

    13 Mar 1867 LR 3 Eq 801, Equity

    MORTGAGE — Mortgagor wrongfully in possession — Mortgagee entitled to Tack.
    SIR R. MALINS, V.C.:— At the time the testator executed this will the mortgagee had the legal estate in the copyholds. The testator died in 1832, and devised this estate to his wife and children, but the will was not proved, and was not entered upon the court rolls. The widow having taken possession, went, in the year 1845, to America with some of her family, leaving the heir-at-law in possession of the estate. In 1851 Mr. Longrigg took a transfer of the legal estate, and was admitted, and made a further advance of £90. The question then is, whether

  • Penn v Bibby

    14 Dec 1866 LR 3 Eq 308, Equity

    PATENT — Certificate for Costs — Second Trial

  • Attorney-General v Bishop Of Manchester

    16 Jan 1867 LR 3 Eq 436, Equity

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    ECCLESIASTICAL LAW — Church building acts (58 geo. 3, c. 45, 59 geo. 3, c. 134, and 3 geo. 4, c. 72) — Conveyance by Trustee of a Charity to Church Building Commissioners

  • Imperial Mercantile Credit Association v Whitham

    15 Nov 1866 LR 3 Eq 89, Equity

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PRACTICE — Corporation Plaintiff — Interrogatories for Examination of Officers

  • McCarogher v Whieldon

    25 Jan 1867 LR 3 Eq 236, Equity

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 2.
    COVENANT — Legacy of Residue — Double Portions

  • Sewell v Crewe-Read

    16 Nov 1866 LR 3 Eq 60, Equity

    LAND — Mortmain — Legacy to be applied in building Parsonage.
    LORD ROMILLY, M.R.:— I am of opinion that this legacy is valid, and that the testator, by directing the money to be laid out in building the parsonage-house, has distinctly indicated an intention that it was to be laid out, not in the purchase of land, but in building a house, either on the glebe land, or on the land which had been purchased by the Dean and Chapter of Westminster. The case of Dixon v. Butler, which was argued and decided without reference to the statute 43 Geo. 3, c. 108, and was approved of by the House of

  • In Re Doncaster Permanent Building Society

    10 Nov 1866 LR 3 Eq 158, Equity

    BUILDING SOCIETY — Permanent building society — Redemption of Mortgages

  • In Re Joint Stock Discount Co (No 3)

    10 Dec 1866 LR 3 Eq 77, Equity

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COMPANY — Contributory — Transfer of Shares

  • Tulloch v Tulloch

    24 Jan 1867 LR 3 Eq 574, Equity

    PRACTICE — Chancery Amendment Act, 15 & 16 Vict. c. 86, s. 55 — Sale before Decree.
    SIR R. MALINS, V.C.:— I have no intention of departing from the principle laid down in the case of Prince v. Cooper. The decision in that case proceeds on the ground that it was an attempt to obtain a decision of the Court on a material point in a contested suit, upon motion for a sale. In this case an application was made to the Defendants' solicitor to consent to the cause being heard as a short cause. That application was refused, and I can only think it was under some misapprehension as to the proper course to be taken,

  • Financial Corpn v Bristol and North Somerset Railway Co

    07 Feb 1867 LR 3 Eq 422, Equity

    PRACTICE — Time to answer — Evasive Answer

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies