Results: 43

  • Cooper (Rowland Burrard) v Cooper (William Henry)

    04 May 1874 LR 7 HL 53, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 3.
    DEEDWillElection
  • Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co Ltd v Riche

    07 Jun 1875 LR 7 HL 653, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive. Subsequent citations: 18.
    COMPANYCompanies act, 1862Memorandum of Association
  • Cook v Fowler

    15 May 1874 LR 7 HL 27, HL

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    INTERESTWarrant of attorneyDefeazance
  • Swindon Waterworks Co v Wilts & Berks Canal Navigation Co

    15 Jun 1875 LR 7 HL 697, DC

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral.
    CANALRiparian OwnerWater Rights.
    THE LORD CHANCELLOR (Lord Cairns):— Your Lordships desired to hear a few observations with regard to the form of the decree; not, I think, because there was any doubt as to the correctness in point of substance of the judgment of the Lords Justices, but because the decree had, probably per incuriam, assumed a form which was scarcely apposite, having regard to the nature of the issues which were raised. My Lords, the questions which are raised in the present case are, no doubt, questions of very considerable importance to the parties; but they are questions which appear to me
  • Hilliard v Eiffe

    15 May 1874 LR 7 HL 39, HL

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    PRACTICESuit by legatee alone20 & 21 Vict. c. 79, s. 68.
    [1874 April 27.] THE LORD CHANCELLOR (Lord Cairns):— We have now received a communication from the learned Judges of the Court of Appeal in Ireland stating that they are quite satisfied that the objection urged at the Bar here upon the subject of the will of the testator having been proved, was not taken or insisted upon in the Court of Appeal in Ireland. The statement made to this House was that Mr. Butt, the leading counsel for the Appellant before the Court of Appeal in Ireland, being very much pressed for time, and being desirous to be away to
  • Hollins v Fowler

    06 Jul 1875 LR 7 HL 757, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 4.
    TORTTroverConversion
  • Charter v Charter

    24 Jul 1874 LR 7 HL 364, HL

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    WILLDescriptionName
  • Dawkins v Lord Rokeby

    01 Feb 1873 LR 8 QB 255, Ex Ct

    28 Jun 1875 LR 7 HL 744, DC

    Subsequent considerations : 2 positive; 1 neutral; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 25.
    LIBEL AND SLANDERPrivileged CommunicationProceedings of Court of Inquiry instituted by Commander-in-Chief under Articles of War
    MILITARY LAWMilitary court of inquiryDefamatory Statements by a Witness
  • Robinson v Mollett

    06 Jul 1875 LR 7 HL 802, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive.
    PRINCIPAL AND AGENTBrokerCustom of a particular Market.
    THE LORD CHANCELLOR proposed the following question to the Judges:— Whether the judgments of the Courts of Common Pleas and Exchequer Chamber were right? [1875 May 7.] MR. JUSTICE BLACKBURN:— My Lords, in answer to your Lordships' question, I say that in my opinion the judgments of the Courts of Common Pleas and Exchequer Chamber are right. The Plaintiff seeks to recover in consequence of his having incurred liability from executing (in the manner stated in the Case) two orders to purchase tallow for the Defendant, one being an order to purchase 50 tons given on the 2nd of April,
  • Codrington (Helen Jane) v Codrington (William John)

    12 Jul 1875 LR 7 HL 854, DC

    Subsequent citations: 3.
    MARRIAGEMarriage settlementCoverture

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies