Results: 33

  • Morgan (George) v Crawshay (Henry)

    28 Jul 1871 LR 5 HL 304, HL

    COALCoal minesIron Mines
  • Grier v Grier

    18 Jun 1872 LR 5 HL 688, HL

    MARRIAGE“issue”“Settle”
  • Harmood W Banner and J Young v Carruthers C Johnston (In re Barned’s Banking Co)

    19 May 1871 LR 5 HL 157, HL

    COMPANYWinding-upSecurities
  • Neilson v Betts

    06 Mar 1871 LR 5 HL 1, HL

    Subsequent citations: 3.
    PATENTForeign-made ArticleUser in England
  • Shaw v Sir W Foster, Bart and A G Pooley

    14 Mar 1872 LR 5 HL 321, HL

    Subsequent citations: 14.
    VENDOR AND PURCHASEREquitable MortgageNotice.
    LORD CHELMSFORD, after stating the nature of the questions in the case, said:— According to the well-known rule in Equity, when the contract for sale was signed by the parties Sir William Foster became a trustee of the estate for Pooley, and Pooley a trustee of the purchase-money for Sir William Foster; and it was competent to Pooley to assign the benefit of his contract, or to charge his equitable interest in the property in favour of another person, and upon notice given to Sir William Foster of such assignment or charge, he would have been bound to protect and
  • Shepherd v Harrison

    28 Apr 1871 LR 5 HL 116, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 1.
    SHIPPINGTransfer of propertyInvoice
  • Greene & King v Bateman

    18 Jun 1872 LR 5 HL 591, HL

    PRACTICEMisdirectionImplied Fraud.
    THE LORD CHANCELLOR (Lord Hatherley) after fully stating the case said:— On these facts it seems to me that the device does not affect Bateman, but only Greene and the company. It was argued before us that Bateman, being the man supplying the iron, and having a good deal to do with railways, must have known exactly what was meant when Greene said to him, Only let me have the power of dealing with the iron, so that I can hand it over to the company, and so that a certificate can be given to me by the engineer of
  • Ireland (George) v Livingston (Joseph Gibbons)

    30 Apr 1871 LR 5 HL 395, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 8.
    CONTRACTContract by letter of ordersPerformance
  • Helbert v Banner (In re Barned’s Bank)

    06 Mar 1871 LR 5 HL 28, HL

    COMPANYCompanies act, 1862Winding-up
  • Knox v Gye

    08 Jul 1872 LR 5 HL 656, HL

    Subsequent considerations : 1 positive; 2 neutral. Subsequent citations: 10.
    LIMITATION OF ACTIONStatute of limitationsPartners

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies