Results: 63

• Westropp v Elligott

  07 Jul 1884 9 App Cas 815, HL

  LANDLORD AND TENANT — Land law (ireland) act 1881 (44 & 45 vict. c. 49) s. 58 sub-s. 3 — Landlord and Tenant
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  LANDLORD AND TENANT — Land law (ireland) act 1881 (44 & 45 vict. c. 49) s. 58 sub-s. 3 — Landlord and Tenant — Pasture — Land let to be used wholly or mainly for Pasture.

  1 Statute considered
• Mersey Steel and Iron Co v Naylor

  13 Jun 1882 9 QBD 648, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral. Subsequent citations: 31.
  CONTRACT — Rescission of Contract — Refusal to be Bound
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  CONTRACT — Rescission of Contract — Refusal to be Bound — Winding-up — Set off of unliquidated Damages in Action.
• In re Speight

  20 Jan 1883 22 Ch D 727; [1875-1890] 22 Ch 727, CA (BACON, V.C. JESSEL, M.R., LINDLEY and BOWEN, L.JJ.)

  26 Nov 1883 9 App Cas 1, HL

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 16.
  TRUSTEE — Trustee and cestui que trust — Liability of Trustee for Trust Moneys lost through Broker.

  TRUSTEE AND CESTUI QUE TRUST — Loss of Trust Fund — Employment of Broker
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  TRUSTEE — Trustee and cestui que trust — Liability of Trustee for Trust Moneys lost through Broker.

  TRUSTEE AND CESTUI QUE TRUST — Loss of Trust Fund — Employment of Broker — Ordinary Course of Business — Negligence.

  1 Case considered

• The Great Western Railway Co v The Swindon and Cheltenham Extension Railway Co

  06 May 1884 9 App Cas 787, HL

  Subsequent citations: 4.
  RAILWAY — Railway company — Compulsory Powers
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  RAILWAY — Railway company — Compulsory Powers — Easement — Hereditaments — “Land,” whether includes Incorporeal Hereditaments — Lands Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 (8 & 9 Vict. c. 18) ss. 3, 16, 84, 85.

  1 Statute considered
• Grant & Co v Coverdale Todd & Co

  24 Mar 1884 9 App Cas 470, HL

  Subsequent considerations : 1 positive. Subsequent citations: 5.
  SHIPPING — Ship — Charterparty
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  SHIPPING — Ship — Charterparty — “Frost preventing loading.”
• Great Eastern Railway v Goldsmid

  18 Dec 1883 25 ChD 511, CA

  Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 6.
  MARKET — Disturbance — Injunction
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  MARKET — Disturbance — Injunction — Alleged Failure on part of Owners to provide Adequate Accommodation — Waiver of Statutory Rights — Illegality.

• The Rio Tinto

  22 Nov 1883 9 App Cas 356, PC

  SHIPPING — Maritime lien — Vice-Admiralty Jurisdiction
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  SHIPPING — Maritime lien — Vice-Admiralty Jurisdiction — 26 & 27 Vict. c. 24, s. 10, sub-s. 10 — Necessaries.

• The Municipal Permanent Investment Building Society v Richard Horatio Couch Kent

  10 Mar 1884 9 App Cas 260, HL

  BUILDING SOCIETY — Building societies act 1874 (37 & 38 vict. c. 42) s. 16 sub-s. 9, s. 34 — Jurisdiction of High Court over Dispute between Society and Member
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  BUILDING SOCIETY — Building societies act 1874 (37 & 38 vict. c. 42) s. 16 sub-s. 9, s. 34 — Jurisdiction of High Court over Dispute between Society and Member — Arbitration.

  1 Statute considered

• Sir John Swinburne, Bart v George Milburn, Ann Clarke, and Sarah Elliot

  04 Aug 1884 9 App Cas 844, HL

  Subsequent citations: 2.
  LANDLORD AND TENANT — Lease for Lives — Covenant for Renewal on dropping of one or more Lives
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  LANDLORD AND TENANT — Lease for Lives — Covenant for Renewal on dropping of one or more Lives — Construction.

• In Re Newton’s Patents

  08 Jul 1884 9 App Cas 592, PC

  PATENT — 46 & 47 vict. c. 57, s. 25, cl. 4 — Accounts of Foreign Profits.
  SIR ARTHUR HOBHOUSE: — In this case the petitioners, the Tilghman Patent Sand Blast Company, Limited, are the assignees of Tilghman's English patents, and it appears by their petition that Tilghman held patents in France, Austria, Belgium, Italy, and the United States; and for the present purpose no distinction can be drawn between the petitioners and Tilghman himself. Objections were made to the petition by various parties, and one of them (advanced by the Messrs. Pilkington) was to this effect, that Tilghman, or the persons for the time being owners of the authorized invention, had obtained with them all like
  Expand

  Case index catchwords

  PATENT — 46 & 47 vict. c. 57, s. 25, cl. 4 — Accounts of Foreign Profits.