Results: 44

  • The Mali Ivo

    27 Apr 1869 LR 2 AE 356, Admiralty

    Subsequent citations: 1.
    COLLISIONCollision in foreign watersLis alibi pendens
  • The Lizzie (No 1)

    21 Apr 1868 LR 2 AE 254, Admiralty

    ADMIRALTYBottomryDuty of Master to communicate with Owner of Cargo before hypothecating.
    SIR ROBERT PHILLIMORE. The Lizzie, a brig belonging to the port of Cardiff, sailed under a charterparty, dated Liverpool, the 15th of July, 1865, by which it was agreed between the owner, George Noel, and Daniel Price, of Minatitlan, merchant, that the vessel should, after discharge of outward cargo, proceed to Minatitlan, in the river Goatzocoalcos, where she was to receive a cargo of mahogany and (or) cedar, and proceed with it to Queenstown or Falmouth, for orders to discharge in a safe port in the United Kingdom, and deliver the same to the charterers, on payment of freight. The
  • The Freedom (No 1)

    27 Jan 1869 LR 2 AE 346, Admiralty

    SHIPPINGDamage to CargoPleading
  • The Feronia

    04 Feb 1868 LR 2 AE 65, Admiralty

    SHIPPINGRight of master also part owner to payment of wages and disbursements out of freightMortgagees in Possession
  • The Bishop Of Norwich v Pearse

    04 Jun 1868 LR 2 AE 281, Arches Ct

    CRIMECriminal suitEvidence of Defendant
  • The Royal Charter

    16 Feb 1869 LR 2 AE 362, Admiralty

    COSTSPracticeDamage caused by Pilot employed compulsorily
  • The Leader

    27 Jun 1868 LR 2 AE 314, Admiralty

    PRACTICEGarnishee OrderAttorney's Lien for Costs
  • Thetis, The

    Subsequent considerations : 1 neutral; 1 negative. Subsequent citations: 2.
  • The Excelsior

    27 May 1868 LR 2 AE 268, Admiralty

    SHIPPINGDamage done by a ship to a breakwaterRespective Duties of Master and Dockmaster.
    May 27. SIR R. PHILLIMORE. The questions for the Court to decide are, whether the damage (which is clearly proved) was caused by the negligence or default of the master or his servants, or by the misconduct of the dockmaster in causing the vessel to be improperly moored; or whether the damage was caused partly by the misconduct of the master of the vessel, and partly by that of the dockmaster. [After stating the facts as above]:— These are the principal facts of the case. The law applicable to them must be determined by a consideration of the respective duties
  • Sheppard v Bennett

    30 Apr 1869 LR 2 AE 335, Arches Ct

    ECCLESIASTICAL LAWChurch Discipline Act (3 & 4 Vict. c. 86)Letters of Request

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies